Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

yeah it is look again

April 12, 2017 09:40AM
Quote
PHDram
[sports.yahoo.com]

but whatever..youre right. it was an imaginative and unpredictable offense. the only things holding boras back was inexperience, the la move, and the players.

Yes that's a fan blog. Look again. Yahoo publishes them but that's what they are. They have one for every team.

In terms of your claim about what I am saying, .....funny, I just posted this:

Quote

zn
April 12, 2017 01:55PM
[ramsrule.com]

Now the way that gets misread is that somehow people take it to mean that the Rams offense was UNpredictable. No. It just means that unless you know offensive assignments, fans have no clue whether or not a defense simply read the offense correctly several plays in a row, or if the offense just simply did not execute.

Then saying THAT somehow gets taken as saying Boras was a good coordinator. Clearly he was not ready---and the proof of that is the fact that while the offenses on average did decently in the 1st quarter, it could not adjust to the defense adjusting to it. To me that seems to say that Boras was not good at in-game adjustments and thinking on his feet in game situations.

Ph, you're not debating what I am actually saying.

Here's a fuller version:

I have always found that "they're precdictable" is a fan mantra that is supposed to cover everything when an offense is poor and the team has been losing.

To me, it seldom if ever really means anything. For one thing several strong offenses are NOT noted for being UNpredictable (Seattle for example). So that's an over-rated issue. I think the REAL issue is just simply execution.

I just don't think that using unproveable fan mantras like "they were predictable" means anything, really. It' s just a kind of catch-all complaint.

To me the issue is always execution.

In terms of being predictable, look at Washington's offense last year. They ran a higher percentage of the time out of multiple TE sets, and if they were in 3 WR sets, they were going to pass. The stats back that and it was just plain obvious. BUT although defenses had to know that, they still did not manage to stop them that much. So I think the entire "predictable" issue is just one of those things people say. I don't think it stands up well to close scrutiny.

Which again does not mean the 2016 offense was a bunch of superstars. It clearly had problems. Lots of them. It doesn't reduce to one problem. Some of their problems started off the field, in fact.













..



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/12/2017 09:41AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Josh Norris Asks Good Question Regarding Rams O-Line Draft Picks ('14-'16)

RamBill1149April 11, 2017 03:36PM

  Re: Two

merlin474April 11, 2017 03:50PM

  Three

LMU93424April 12, 2017 02:57AM

  Re: Three

Rampage316April 12, 2017 08:21PM

  Re: Two...Winner winner Chicken Dinner

Rampage404April 12, 2017 06:53PM

  Comfortable?

Atlantic Ram313April 11, 2017 04:47PM

  Re: Josh Norris Asks Good Question Regarding Rams O-Line Draft Picks ('14-'16)

CraigMatson343April 11, 2017 11:28PM

  Re: Josh Norris Asks Good Question Regarding Rams O-Line Draft Picks ('14-'16)

Rampage206April 12, 2017 06:55PM

  Zero...

jemach300April 11, 2017 11:43PM

  Here we go again

PHDram332April 12, 2017 04:47AM

  Re: Here we go again

CraigMatson291April 12, 2017 05:05AM

  the huge surprise about Havenstein

zn348April 12, 2017 05:37AM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

PHDram270April 12, 2017 05:53AM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

zn333April 12, 2017 06:26AM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

PHDram301April 12, 2017 07:25AM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

zn316April 12, 2017 07:37AM

  week 13

PHDram289April 12, 2017 07:52AM

  their predictability...

LMU93208April 12, 2017 08:04AM

  yes it can and is

zn295April 12, 2017 08:55AM

  that's a fanblog

zn266April 12, 2017 08:33AM

  not a fan blog

PHDram229April 12, 2017 09:09AM

  yeah it is look again

zn276April 12, 2017 09:40AM

  Re: yeah it is look again

TonyHunter87267April 12, 2017 09:50AM

  Re: yeah it is look again

zn275April 13, 2017 04:00AM

  Re: yeah it is look again

RamsFanSinceLA410April 13, 2017 10:18AM

  interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

ferragamo79408April 12, 2017 07:58AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

PHDram288April 12, 2017 08:16AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

Rampage2K-270April 12, 2017 08:21AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

Rampage594April 12, 2017 07:03PM

  to me it's obvious that Robinson would be a better OT than Hav

zn275April 12, 2017 08:35AM

  Re: to me it's obvious that Robinson would be a better OT than Hav

dzrams290April 12, 2017 10:04AM

  Re: to me it's obvious that Robinson would be a better OT than Hav

Rams43240April 12, 2017 10:16AM

  Re: to me it's obvious that Robinson would be a better OT than Hav

dzrams273April 12, 2017 10:51AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

Rams43234April 12, 2017 09:32AM

  Re: interesting they are thinking about moving Havenstein

zn349April 12, 2017 06:46PM

  Re: the huge surprise about Havenstein

Rampage311April 12, 2017 06:58PM