Stop being slippery. You're trying to go back to the injury issue. I already acknowledge that.
Wade's statements were about past performance at the nickel, not future injury concerns due to his size.
Your phrases such as 'performed like a wasted pick', 'one year of solid play', '1 year of success in year 4, 'not a contributor', etc. are all attacking his performance. That goes beyond any injury concern.
That is what Wade disagreed with. Saying he's one of our best D players is in DIRECT conflict with those phrases above that you made.
And you know that. Let's not try to make it about something else.
You are free to disagree with the future HOF coach (and you don't even need to cast shade on his AO decision to do that.)
I just think it's a bit silly. But carry on...
