Re: both for sure

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

January 02, 2017 08:33AM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 2,840
Status: HOF Inductee

Well yesterday during the first half he was being hit before he could complete his drops.

Sometimes the rusher was back there before Goff. I couldn't take it after the first half.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
Goff's sack rate is outrageous....	max	671	January 02, 2017 07:30AM
both for sure	Hazlet Hacksaw	290	January 02, 2017 07:57AM
He was pulling the ball down pretty fast sometimes	LesBaker	307	January 02, 2017 08:02AM
Re: both for sure	bigjimram21	228	January 02, 2017 08:33AM
a lot of that is STILL Goff the rookie, CK did not have the same sack percentage	zn	311	January 02, 2017 10:48AM
A lot of it is obviously Goff	9er8er	316	January 02, 2017 08:00AM
Assuming that the OL didn't regress is obtuse...	max	319	January 02, 2017 08:22AM
+1 nm	Ram Fan Teacher	217	January 02, 2017 08:36AM
exactly	Suh-weet!	305	January 02, 2017 02:39PM
Or	RFIP	260	January 02, 2017 03:00PM
It's exactly a wishful excuse	9er8er	217	January 02, 2017 05:46PM
Re: A lot of it is obviously Goff	bigjimram21	248	January 02, 2017 08:36AM
Maybe Goff is a running QB?	RFIP	267	January 02, 2017 08:39AM
Re: Maybe Goff is a running QB?	Al45	282	January 02, 2017 09:54AM
I was kidding...nm	RFIP	245	January 02, 2017 10:37AM
Re: Maybe Goff is a running QB?	no name	287	January 02, 2017 02:54PM
Re: Goff's sack rate is outrageous....	elwap0	348	January 02, 2017 12:09PM

Previous Message Next Message

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

RamsFootballFans.com Bucky's Pub The RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate Party Game Time Forum Help and Support Forum Jack Youngblood Chat Jim Everett Chat Kevin Demoff Chat Deacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&A Announcements Recent Messages