Quote
LMU93
After the bye not matter what? And if the Rams win and Keenum played well? I don't get that.
After 2 more losses no matter what? So if they're 6-5, Keenum is still doing alright, and heading to New England the Rams should start Goff then?
In my opinion it starts with Keenum. If he keeps playing well and they remain in contention he stays in. If or when one of those two breaks down then make the change.
Right now if I had to predict a specific game on the calendar I would guess 12/24 vs. SF.
I understand your point there, 93.
Seems counterintuitive to replace a QB that just won a game, huh? Assuming he wins the game, of course.
But here's another perspective. And one that I subscribe to, FWIW.
As we speak, Keenum projects to an 8-8 QB. The very definition of average (for those offended by the term mediocrity).
We are currently ranked #31 as an O.
We didn't trade up for Goff while spending 6 premium picks in the process just to have him try to "learn" on the sideline for the whole season. At least I HOPE not.
We're already losing winnable games with Keenum.
Goff is clearly our long term future. So the question comes down to WHEN, not IF Fisher should make the QB change. A business decision, IOW.
After the bye seems like an optimal time to me.
