October 10, 2016 10:38AM
....[/quote]
Either way, it didn't work and the Rams lost a game most people thought they would lose anyways...missing 3/4 of the d-line and the 2-0 turn over deficit was too much to overcome.

On to Detroit who we absolutely killed last year in Detroit ....let's do it again!!!![/quote]

I saw it as a real 50/50 game. So down 23-19 they couldn't pull it out as they'd done three straight weeks before. Law of averages... They lost to a decent team whose strength was running the ball on a day when 3/4 of their starting DL was out. Not that they'd have shut down McCoy but maybe they give up only 120 vs. 193 with Brockers and Quinn. Sims was also a pass rushing liability and big downgrade at RDE. Zero pressures in 22 pass rushes. Sims really should be limited to running downs if possible with Longacre spelling Quinn more.

Gurley had a great game against Detroit last year. Let's do it again and get to 4-2....


SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Risk vs. Reward Logic

Saban23544October 10, 2016 07:22AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Rampage2K-373October 10, 2016 07:34AM

  Exactly

PHDram396October 10, 2016 07:50AM

  +2

NewMexicoRam226October 10, 2016 08:11AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

zn290October 10, 2016 10:00AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Rampage2K-287October 10, 2016 10:09AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

zn272October 10, 2016 10:21AM

  I forgot they played Detroit last year...

LMU93288October 10, 2016 10:29AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

LMU93294October 10, 2016 10:38AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

bigjimram21205October 10, 2016 01:46PM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Saban23398October 11, 2016 01:21PM