Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

October 10, 2016 10:00AM
Quote
Rampage2K-


In my opinion it would have been better if Fisher just went for the TD on 4th and 4 instead of kicking the late FG.... I would have felt better about that decision.

But don't the numbers factor into that?

I don't know how well this holds up because I just thought of it but here goes. cool smiley

Down 23-16 they kick a FG making it 23-19.

They could have tied it at 23-23 if the 4th down works. But then Buffalo only needs a FG to win...and they had lost Tru.

With things as they are, with the FG not the TD, if the Rams drive down the field and score to make it Rams 26-23, a Buffalo field goal...if it even happens at that point..would just tie the game. .


....
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Risk vs. Reward Logic

Saban23544October 10, 2016 07:22AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Rampage2K-373October 10, 2016 07:34AM

  Exactly

PHDram395October 10, 2016 07:50AM

  +2

NewMexicoRam226October 10, 2016 08:11AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

zn289October 10, 2016 10:00AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Rampage2K-287October 10, 2016 10:09AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

zn272October 10, 2016 10:21AM

  I forgot they played Detroit last year...

LMU93288October 10, 2016 10:29AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

LMU93294October 10, 2016 10:38AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

bigjimram21205October 10, 2016 01:46PM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Saban23397October 11, 2016 01:21PM