October 10, 2016 08:11AM
If he didn't have the nads to go for it in the red zone just moments before, when a failure sets up Buffalo to be inside their own 10 yard line which would give the Rams defense a good chance to make a stop, then why go for it on 4th down inside your own 25 where your defense has less of a chance to make a play?
Indefensible calls, IMO.



NewMexicoRam
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Risk vs. Reward Logic

Saban23547October 10, 2016 07:22AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Rampage2K-375October 10, 2016 07:34AM

  Exactly

PHDram397October 10, 2016 07:50AM

  +2

NewMexicoRam228October 10, 2016 08:11AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

zn291October 10, 2016 10:00AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Rampage2K-291October 10, 2016 10:09AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

zn274October 10, 2016 10:21AM

  I forgot they played Detroit last year...

LMU93291October 10, 2016 10:29AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

LMU93298October 10, 2016 10:38AM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

bigjimram21206October 10, 2016 01:46PM

  Re: Risk vs. Reward Logic ......yes and no

Saban23400October 11, 2016 01:21PM