September 25, 2016 05:57PM | Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 26,730 Status: HOF Inductee |
Quote
sacram
I can't for the life of me, figure out why the Rams would go for 2 in that situation, unless GZ was injured!?!?!
Isn't being up 11 (1TD+2pt conv+FG=TIE) and up 12 (2 TDs needed, NO FGs will help) a huge difference? But JF wanted to be up by 13 for some reason...can anyone explain the logic there? I'm far from a math whiz, but that just doesn't add up for me
Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD? | sacram | 547 | September 25, 2016 05:36PM |
Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD? | Barf33 | 270 | September 25, 2016 05:49PM |
Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD? | The Professor | 317 | September 25, 2016 05:56PM |
It was idiotic! Nm | RFIP | 232 | September 25, 2016 05:57PM |
Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD? | The_Zone | 299 | September 25, 2016 06:03PM |
Beyond belief... | Rampage2K- | 270 | September 25, 2016 06:11PM |