Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

It was idiotic! Nm

September 25, 2016 05:57PM
Quote
sacram
I can't for the life of me, figure out why the Rams would go for 2 in that situation, unless GZ was injured!?!?!

Isn't being up 11 (1TD+2pt conv+FG=TIE) and up 12 (2 TDs needed, NO FGs will help) a huge difference? But JF wanted to be up by 13 for some reason...can anyone explain the logic there? I'm far from a math whiz, but that just doesn't add up for me



R.I.P. Nelson aka TonyHunter87 1971 - 2017 far too soon..

Your last words to me: "Your a great guy RFIP. I was very sad when you left the board, and your son, but was glad to see you back. Take care my friend, may God be by your side." 09/09/2017 12:58AM

No Nelson, you were a far better man than I, and I am sure an awesome husband and father as well. I will miss you my friend. -RFIP
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

sacram543September 25, 2016 05:36PM

  Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

Barf33266September 25, 2016 05:49PM

  Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

The Professor314September 25, 2016 05:56PM

  It was idiotic! Nm

RFIP228September 25, 2016 05:57PM

  Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

The_Zone298September 25, 2016 06:03PM

  Beyond belief...

Rampage2K-266September 25, 2016 06:11PM