Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
sacram
September 25, 2016 05:36PM
I can't for the life of me, figure out why the Rams would go for 2 in that situation, unless GZ was injured!?!?!

Isn't being up 11 (1TD+2pt conv+FG=TIE) and up 12 (2 TDs needed, NO FGs will help) a huge difference? But JF wanted to be up by 13 for some reason...can anyone explain the logic there? I'm far from a math whiz, but that just doesn't add up for me
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

sacram545September 25, 2016 05:36PM

  Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

Barf33268September 25, 2016 05:49PM

  Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

The Professor314September 25, 2016 05:56PM

  It was idiotic! Nm

RFIP231September 25, 2016 05:57PM

  Re: What was the benefit of going for 2 after the last TD?

The_Zone298September 25, 2016 06:03PM

  Beyond belief...

Rampage2K-266September 25, 2016 06:11PM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages