Re: Me too!

Quote
Billy_T

Quote
dzrams
Brockers is slightly above average at best in my book. I'd like to see them extend him but only for the right price.

He could be easily replaced in the draft. In fact, this year I felt they could have a found a DT as late as the 4th round that replaces him.

Major upside, and only 21 for this season. They could have worked him into the lineup slowly, gotten him ready to start in 2017, if Brockers doesn't work out.

My own take on MB, btw, is that he flashes, and can dominate, but isn't consistent. That seems to be an issue with a lot of DTs, though.

I felt Billing would have been perfect. There would have been no need to extend Brockers. Use that $8-$10 mil. somewhere else.

I've seen several people mention the word dominate with Brockers. I don't see it. I see a dominate play here or there every so often but very few dominate games and definitely no dominate games stringed together. You say he can dominate but it's inconsistent. I say he's consistently average. Any dominant flashes are rare IMO.