Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Didn't see it, but the player must have been the issue

August 27, 2016 03:57AM
Quote
RockRam
It has to have been that for some reason the player who touched the ball was not eligible to do so, as opposed to any player on the kick unit touching the ball inside the 5. Perhaps going out of the bounds (thus being ineligible to the be the FIRST to touch the ball) isn't the only reason to make a guy ineligible to touch it first. Otherwise I don't know.

Even at that, and I don't think it was that but...why does the ball come out to the 20 "by rule"? I've never seen a penalty without yardage before except on KO out of bounds?



R.I.P. Nelson aka TonyHunter87 1971 - 2017 far too soon..

Your last words to me: "Your a great guy RFIP. I was very sad when you left the board, and your son, but was glad to see you back. Take care my friend, may God be by your side." 09/09/2017 12:58AM

No Nelson, you were a far better man than I, and I am sure an awesome husband and father as well. I will miss you my friend. -RFIP
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What was this penalty I just saw in Steelers game????

RFIP1013August 26, 2016 04:15PM

  WTF????

RamFanInPA480August 26, 2016 06:44PM

  Something amiss here...

JamesJM586August 26, 2016 09:40PM

  The rule has always been

GreatRamNTheSky424August 26, 2016 11:44PM

  Yes I know "that" rule but

RFIP433August 27, 2016 01:38AM

  Didn't see it, but the player must have been the issue

RockRam455August 27, 2016 03:19AM

  Re: Didn't see it, but the player must have been the issue

RFIP449August 27, 2016 03:57AM

  Rule seems to fit what happened

Ram Fan Teacher376August 27, 2016 08:35AM

  Rules

Ram Fan Teacher432August 27, 2016 08:48AM

  Good research. Nm.

stlramz320August 27, 2016 09:49AM

  Outstanding!!

RFIP324August 27, 2016 11:31AM