Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Didn't see it, but the player must have been the issue

August 27, 2016 03:19AM
It has to have been that for some reason the player who touched the ball was not eligible to do so, as opposed to any player on the kick unit touching the ball inside the 5. Perhaps going out of the bounds (thus being ineligible to the be the FIRST to touch the ball) isn't the only reason to make a guy ineligible to touch it first. Otherwise I don't know.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What was this penalty I just saw in Steelers game????

RFIP1012August 26, 2016 04:15PM

  WTF????

RamFanInPA478August 26, 2016 06:44PM

  Something amiss here...

JamesJM586August 26, 2016 09:40PM

  The rule has always been

GreatRamNTheSky422August 26, 2016 11:44PM

  Yes I know "that" rule but

RFIP432August 27, 2016 01:38AM

  Didn't see it, but the player must have been the issue

RockRam454August 27, 2016 03:19AM

  Re: Didn't see it, but the player must have been the issue

RFIP449August 27, 2016 03:57AM

  Rule seems to fit what happened

Ram Fan Teacher376August 27, 2016 08:35AM

  Rules

Ram Fan Teacher430August 27, 2016 08:48AM

  Good research. Nm.

stlramz318August 27, 2016 09:49AM

  Outstanding!!

RFIP323August 27, 2016 11:31AM