August 23, 2016 08:07AM
Shoot, if he played 5 or 6, that's probably enough to gain a great deal from.

But in the end, to heck with Hasslebeck. The goal OUGHT to be to win games; not to potentially give up wins in order to prep a new QB.
So if Keenum is playing very well, then Goff needs to sit.
And since Fisher is a player's coach, you already know that he's not about to create team dissension (which it would), if they're playing Keenum and winning, by deciding now's the time for Goff despite Keenum's effort. It would send a bad message to the team. Get drafted high and that makes you the starter regardless of what happens on the field. Like I said: that's not Fisher, anyway.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So Keenum is a UFA in 2017 - interesting comment by Hasselback

ferragamo791240August 23, 2016 07:40AM

  Tied into Fisher?

stlrams13517August 23, 2016 07:44AM

  Yep. Goff doesn't need 16 games to be ready to start next year

RockRam420August 23, 2016 08:07AM

  Re: So Keenum is a UFA in 2017 - interesting comment by Hasselback

LMU93437August 23, 2016 08:13AM

  Re: What is truly going to drive this decision

merlin769August 23, 2016 08:43AM

  Mannion will be #2 in 2017. Works out well

promomasterj515August 23, 2016 09:46AM

  Re: Mannion will be #2 in 2017. Works out well

AlbaNY_Ram392August 23, 2016 12:26PM

  Re: Mannion has played like our #1 so far, don't you think?

oldschoolramfan471August 23, 2016 01:45PM

  Re: Mannion has played like our #1 so far, don't you think?

napoli543August 23, 2016 03:33PM

  I'm somewhere between you and Napoli...

JamesJM348August 23, 2016 04:56PM

  As big as a surprise as it is to me.

RustyRay461August 23, 2016 06:52PM