July 14, 2016 12:50PM | Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 15,672 Status: HOF Inductee |
Quote
LMU93
The thing with PFF is I think they do a good job in season of grading week to week. But they don't project based on anything else. I think the Rams' OL, for example, has definite promise based on what the rookies should last year and considering the offseason work Robinson did. A top 10 unit? No. But that low? I don't agree.
And any team starting a rookie at a position is going to get dinged by them.
Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
PFF: Position unit rankings entering 2016 | LMU93 | 1576 | July 14, 2016 03:45AM |
Re: PFF: Position unit rankings entering 2016 | Rams43 | 720 | July 14, 2016 06:51AM |
So...you agree with their good rankings of our units? | promomasterj | 733 | July 14, 2016 11:40AM |
Re: So...you agree with their good rankings of our units? | no name | 693 | July 14, 2016 12:32PM |
rankings of our units | LMU93 | 608 | July 14, 2016 12:36PM |
Re: rankings of our units | laram | 619 | July 14, 2016 12:50PM |
Re: rankings of our units | six2stack | 602 | July 14, 2016 01:08PM |