Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I want to raise a question about the Rams future at LOT...

April 01, 2018 08:57AM
We have Big Whit under contract through ‘19, of course, and he had a helluva ‘17 season although I thought he might have tapered off a little bit toward the end of it.

Rams don’t pick until #23 this year and I suspect that they might be picking even later in the future.

We all know that historically teams have found it difficult to find quality starting LOT’s after the 1st and certainly after the 2nd rounds.

This is considered a weak LOT class, so a quality player is unlikely to be there at #23.

It’s just a question of when, not if, that the Rams must have Whit’s replacement on board.

Some of the above are facts and some are opinions, although pretty widely held opinions.

What to do?

Question for discussion: Since Kromer is considered an extremely capable OL coach, is it not possible that he could leapfrog the league averages and still find and develop a LOT that could become Whit’s eventual replacement in our 3rd round or maybe even later?

Or via a FA that other coaches currently lightly regard? Like Sully at C last year? Or Woods at WR last year? A hidden gems kinda thing?

Or, heck, maybe even an adequate player already on our 63? A player that only Kromer sees the potential?

Maybe use the shotgun approach with our many 6th rounders?

Just putting this out there for discussion, but I will say this. Kromer deserves a TON of credit for correctly assessing our OL situation last year and advocating not drafting any OL players, offloading Barnes and GRob, and adding the likes of Whit and Sully. He literally turned chicken”stuff” into chicken salad in one offseason. I sure wouldn’t bet against him addressing our LOT situation, that’s for sure. Coaching matters,

What do y’all think?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  I want to raise a question about the Rams future at LOT...

Rams43725April 01, 2018 08:57AM

  Future at LOT...

OzRam370April 01, 2018 09:26AM

  Re: Future at LOT...

zn311April 01, 2018 09:47AM

  I like one option...

jemach318April 01, 2018 09:28AM

  or just wish upon a star

zn307April 01, 2018 09:35AM

  I guess it's better to waste a sixth rounder vs. a first rounder...

jemach238April 01, 2018 09:45AM

  false dichotomy

zn324April 01, 2018 09:52AM

  I wouldn't take the comment literally...

jemach376April 01, 2018 10:02AM

  Re: I wouldn't take the comment literally...

zn224April 01, 2018 10:07AM

  Re: false dichotomy

bigjimram21197April 01, 2018 06:47PM

  that's very interesting

zn348April 01, 2018 07:36PM

  OL future

LMU93199April 02, 2018 03:09AM

  Re: or just wish upon a star

k3270April 01, 2018 10:30AM

  Re: What do the numbers show for 3rd rounders? Nm

dzrams367April 01, 2018 10:40AM

  Re: What do the numbers show for 3rd rounders? Nm

zn257April 01, 2018 11:02AM

  oops

zn245April 01, 2018 01:56PM

  Wow!

stlramz225April 01, 2018 06:24PM

  Re: I think our 1st pick is LT

spagsbacker276April 01, 2018 10:17AM

  Re: I think our 1st pick is LT

waterfield249April 01, 2018 10:59AM

  Re: I think our 1st pick is LT

Ohiorams169April 03, 2018 03:27AM

  I think they have their eyes on Tyrell Crosby

PeoriaRa242April 02, 2018 06:25AM

  Tyrell Crosby would be good at RT. imo

SunTzu_vs_Camus245April 02, 2018 08:35AM

  Re: Tyrell Crosby would be good at RT. imo

oldschoolramfan196April 02, 2018 09:29AM

  or Guard nm

ferragamo79200April 02, 2018 09:30AM

  agreed, ferragamo...or OG...or RT is a start.

SunTzu_vs_Camus292April 02, 2018 09:44AM

  It's an anomaly to find a very good starting LT past round 1

RockRam340April 02, 2018 12:05PM

  yes agree and even in round 1 its hard to find one

ferragamo79167April 03, 2018 08:11AM