Out of all those choices you came up with I can only agree with Robinson. Tavon would be thought of differently if his punt returns were allowed to stand. Many of his returns that went for big yards, some even TD's were called back due to penalties, not his fault. His play on offense was relegated to what the system was and that offense reeked. Quick made some outlandish catches but was injury prone, possibly due to the crazy balls he came down with time to time, and again his offense influence was determined by and offense that reeked. Mason was a head case for sure, but as bad as we were he was our only thing that resembled even a sniff of a running back, again due to an offense that reeked. Fisher and those before him were just bad at picking coaches for offensive duties for the most part, the offenses put out show that. Pead was a super fast guy, but again showed little....a part of that was again the offense that was being run.

Robinson was a freak athletically but IMO had no love/must interest in the game of football, he was drafted for his #'s at the combine IMO more over his play, I don't think he played much ball pre draft. Biggest thing I remember about him coming out was he could do a back flip at his size and weight.