Speed I get your point the Rams need a quality backup QB period end of sentence. Quality backups cost money. Money the Rams weren't inclined to spend for quite some time. The Wentz point as opposed to say a Flacco type is to offset the higher cost Wentz can provide something a lot of vet QB's can't. Wentz can provide a greater ROI (return on investment) because he would provide not only a top tier insurance policy were Matthew to get dinged up, he could also be incorporated into a small package of plays in every game, whether that be short yardage or goal line. The run or pass flexibility he would provide could be substantial, a much scarier Taysom Hill. So while the money types might frown at paying more money to a guy that holds a clipboard all year, if you can sell them on that guy having a 7-12 play package every week, you might have a chance to win them over.
