Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: They did, but not they way you thought

June 14, 2023 10:40AM
A team can't earmark money for their rookie pool. The top 51 guys that the team has under contract count against the cap and there's no mechanism for saving 14 spots or $10.25M for the rookie class. So before Kupp renegotiated his deal the Rams really did only have $1.3M in cap space and needed to sign their rookies with only that much headroom.

However, as the Rams sign their 14 rookies the lowest paid 14 guys get bounced off the list. Those 14 guys, even if they only made $750,000, collectively count $10.5M against the cap. The Rams rookie pool is $10.24M for 2023: every time they sign a rookie one of the low end guys get bounced off the list and the net effect of signing all 14 rookies is essentially nothing.

Anyone who thought that the Rams could sign all their rookies with only $1.3M in cap space was absolutely right. And this is why.



AlbaNY_Ram



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/14/2023 10:42AM by AlbaNY_Ram.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams with an extra $10 mil in cap space

JimYoungblood53194June 14, 2023 09:36AM

  So, who do we buy for $10 mil? One guy? two guys?

JimYoungblood5389June 14, 2023 09:52AM

  8-10 million owed to draft picks alone.

CROMWELL2196June 14, 2023 09:55AM

  Yep. No money to buy a FA is baked into this. (nm)

RockRam61June 14, 2023 10:28AM

  Okay, I stand corrected

JimYoungblood5384June 14, 2023 10:30AM

  I thought they had that money budgeted

JimYoungblood5360June 14, 2023 10:28AM

  Re: They did, but not they way you thought

AlbaNY_Ram67June 14, 2023 10:40AM

  Well that makes sense

JimYoungblood5365June 14, 2023 10:46AM

  Re: More to the story

AlbaNY_Ram86June 14, 2023 10:32AM