Quote
AlbaNY_Ram
Kenneth Arthur, the author of the article, apparently didn't take a close look at the chart. It does indeed show the Rams in 10th place at $318M. But the chart says it represents 3-year operating income. That does not correlate with this statement (from the article): "The Rams were valued at $318 million."
Sorry, Kenneth, but income and value aren't the same thing.
I'm pretty sure that the chart says the Rams made $318M over the last 3 years.
But the team itself is actually worth $6.2 billion. [
www.forbes.com]
He also says
Quote
Kenneth Arthur
At $318,000,000, the Rams must owe part of their value to hosting games in Los Angeles at one of the most high-tech, state-of-the-art venues in the world. Winning a Super Bowl didn’t hurt, but as the Knicks and Giants can attest to, “location, location, location” matters more.
If he replaced "value" with income the sentence would be fine
