Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

has to be 40 (Hirsch)

Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
LMU93
May 25, 2023 01:12PM
Can't see why it's not already. Way before my time but historically he would seem to be the most logical choice for sure.

2nd I think would probably be a debate between Mack (65) and Pace (76).

But let's not go retiring dozens of numbers like the Boston Celtics...
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What number should be retired next by the Rams?

BerendsenRam367May 25, 2023 08:41AM

  None, IMO

NewMexicoRam101May 25, 2023 08:47AM

  Wait a second! Warner retired a Cardinal?

Ramsdude147May 25, 2023 08:53AM

  I thought it was you don't get..

sstrams103May 25, 2023 09:20AM

  Only ONE jersey should be hanging from the rafters!!!!

Ramgator133May 25, 2023 10:33AM

  Now that was funny!!!

Ramsdude107May 25, 2023 11:00AM

  Re: What number should be retired next by the Rams?

WhiteHorns115May 25, 2023 11:52AM

  has to be 40 (Hirsch)

LMU93129May 25, 2023 01:12PM

  I'd be ok if none were retired at all

Ramsdude101May 25, 2023 01:19PM

  It's weird, what "unofficially retired" or "in effect" means-- Attachments

JimYoungblood53151May 25, 2023 01:26PM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comJourdan Rodrigue Q&ARams ChroniclesBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages