Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile


has to be 40 (Hirsch)

May 25, 2023 01:12PM
Can't see why it's not already. Way before my time but historically he would seem to be the most logical choice for sure.

2nd I think would probably be a debate between Mack (65) and Pace (76).

But let's not go retiring dozens of numbers like the Boston Celtics...

  What number should be retired next by the Rams?

BerendsenRam126May 25, 2023 08:41AM

  None, IMO

NewMexicoRam57May 25, 2023 08:47AM

  Wait a second! Warner retired a Cardinal?

Ramsdude72May 25, 2023 08:53AM

  I thought it was you don't get..

sstrams50May 25, 2023 09:20AM

  Only ONE jersey should be hanging from the rafters!!!!

Ramgator65May 25, 2023 10:33AM

  Now that was funny!!!

Ramsdude40May 25, 2023 11:00AM

  Re: What number should be retired next by the Rams?

WhiteHorns50May 25, 2023 11:52AM

  has to be 40 (Hirsch)

LMU9339May 25, 2023 01:12PM

  I'd be ok if none were retired at all

Ramsdude39May 25, 2023 01:19PM

  It's weird, what "unofficially retired" or "in effect" means-- Attachments

JimYoungblood5338May 25, 2023 01:26PM