Quote
dzrams
Quote
Rampage2K-
Peters was gone anyway, they weren't going to pay him regardless if Wade stayed or not....he's a system corner who really only plays zone. I like Peters, one of my favorite players, but I don't want to see him play man or try to be our top corner. He doesn't allow for you to play defense the way Ramsey did.
Who says they weren't gonna pay him regardless?
If Wade is not going to stay who says they have to play a man system? Nothing says they had to be locked into man. If the new DC played a zone system then Peters would have been excellent.
The point is, shouldn't you determine who the DC will be and what your system is going to be before you make a major personnel change?
Like I said, I like Peters but Ramsey is the better player....no one in their right mind would take Peters over Ramsey.
Remember, they dumped Peters before they even had Ramsey....they wanted to get something before they got nothing from him by letting him walk.
Donald on Ramsey
“It was like he was there for a year or two already,” Donald said of how Ramsey fit in the defense, on ESPN’s Golic and Wingo. “He’s one heck of a football player. He’s one of the best at what he does at his position. Adding him to the mix with the players that we’ve got, it was definitely a plus for us. We lost two good corners – that was hurting, we were worried about that – but we brought another good one in, so the things you’re able to do with him and the way we use him to help us as far as pass rushers. He can lock up one side of the field and guard the best wide receivers on the field. So when you’ve got a guy like that, he tends to help the defensive line make some plays, too. Adding him to the mix was a big plus for us.”
Peters doesn't effect the defense the way Ramsey can.
Agree to disagree, but I'll take Ramsey over two lottery tickets every day.....
[
www.instagram.com]
