Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

yep that's how it is with 2nd contracts

March 21, 2019 03:34PM
Quote
bigjimram21
Unless he totally wets the bed this year, he will get a new deal right up there with the other top "paid" QBs. Does he "deserve" it, who knows, but no one other than Snead, and McVay will make the call.

Why do people think JG will get less than the going rate every other QB is getting off "potential? Jimmy G got a massive deal and hadn't done a thing in all the years he's been in the league. Same with Stafford,

I get it, people don't want him to get paid if it means others don't , but it's the way it works right now.


And he will get the deal because the franchise tag would be more than what the deal would be spread over the 5/6 years. imo.

Every year there's a going rate for every position when it comes to 2nd contracts. It can vary a BIT from player to player but not much.

It has nothing to do with our sense of a player's "worth." It's the market. The market says, this year this is what qbs get for 2nd contracts. It always goes up annually, right along with the cap. Basically you put the player in a category--is this a keeper franchise type qb? Or not? If yes then the rate is more or less set, The team decides, is this a player I want to keep. If he is generally seen as a franchise qb and YOUR answer is no we don't want to keep him, then someone else pays him. If the answer is yes we want to keep him, then you pay him.

On a 2nd contract you're paying a player so you have him in his prime. The market says, having this player at this position in his prime costs this much.

As I said, either you pay the guy that, or someone else does.

There is absolutely no metric or mechanism out there, at all, which says this guy wasn't that good in these particular games so he is "worth" x% less. None of this works this way.

.

....



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/21/2019 03:36PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Effect of having a top 5 paid QB on a team's chances of making the Conference Championship

AlbaNY_Ram495March 21, 2019 10:27AM

  I'm not sure why this came up...but as per Goff...

jemach217March 21, 2019 10:49AM

  Re: I'm not sure why this came up...but as per Goff...

AlbaNY_Ram230March 21, 2019 12:10PM

  I'm hoping the Rams aren't ready to go that high...

jemach141March 22, 2019 03:03AM

  Re: I'm hoping the Rams aren't ready to go that high...

AlbaNY_Ram156March 22, 2019 03:40AM

  Re: I'm not sure why this came up...but as per Goff...

bigjimram21188March 21, 2019 12:28PM

  yep that's how it is with 2nd contracts

zn174March 21, 2019 03:34PM

  Re: Effect of having a top 5 paid QB on a team's chances of making the Conference Championship

Coy Bacon184March 21, 2019 12:11PM

  Re: Effect of having a top 5 paid QB on a team's chances of making the Conference Championship

AlbaNY_Ram171March 21, 2019 12:40PM

  Re: Effect of having a top 5 paid QB on a team's chances of making the Conference Championship

Coy Bacon174March 21, 2019 07:22PM

  Re: Effect of having a top 5 paid QB on a team's chances of making the Conference Championship

RamsFanSinceLA156March 22, 2019 08:54AM

  Re: Effect of having a top 5 paid QB on a team's chances of making the Conference Championship

Coy Bacon134March 22, 2019 03:16PM

  Re: Effect of having a top 5 paid QB on a team's chances of making the Conference Championship

AlbaNY_Ram114March 22, 2019 07:29PM

  interesting though I would put it a little differently

zn159March 21, 2019 12:27PM

  Re: interesting though I would put it a little differently

bigjimram21153March 21, 2019 12:29PM

  oh yeah no question

zn154March 21, 2019 01:00PM

  if Tom Brady wasn't cheating the salary cap by taking stock options in ...

Rampage2K-184March 21, 2019 12:42PM

  don't be fooled by Brady

zn165March 21, 2019 01:05PM

  Stats cannot predict the future; they can only shed light on the past

RockRam159March 21, 2019 12:43PM

  using a sub group is flawed

headslapper184March 21, 2019 01:06PM

  Re: using a sub group is flawed

AlbaNY_Ram190March 21, 2019 02:06PM

  Re: using a sub group is flawed

headslapper143March 22, 2019 12:08AM

  Re: using a sub group is flawed

AlbaNY_Ram179March 22, 2019 02:38AM

  My initial thoughts

max165March 22, 2019 04:06AM