Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Michael Irvin on Inside the NFL

February 08, 2019 08:50PM
Quote
RamBill
Quote
Ram49
[attachment 4336 51928026_2358258817554126_4247134305353990144_n.jpg]

I can't agree. In fact, I just attached something (I can't get the photo to link) where I believe that our multi million dollar WR should have caught two dropped TDs.

That isn't to take away from a down night.....but he got pressured on over 70% of the snaps. Bad play calling and bad line play added to his bad night.

But I'm sure not thrilled with Cooks dropping TDs that were right in his hands. Yes, under duress....but in his hands.


Someone said the two Cooks plays were 50/50 balls....Irvin stands up yelling....those are 80/20 balls if Michael Irvin is the WR....it's 50/50 if it's Cooks.

He was adamant that those two have to be caught.

He's right....they were tough plays, but top level WR's would make those plays.


On the 70% pressure number....here's the actual numbers:

The Patriots' defense pressured Goff on 38 percent of his dropbacks, and the young quarterback finished 3-of-12 when under duress. That's tied for the worst completion percentage for any QB that threw at least 10 passes under pressure in a Super Bowl. Meanwhile, the Rams only pressured Brady on 14 percent of his dropbacks.

I think the 70% number came from Polian saying: I estimated the Pats line was winning at the snap of the ball about 70% of the time, which is amazing.That doesn't equate to pressure....they were just getting a jump on the Rams O-line on most snaps, in his estimation.


Another amazing stat--

On the night, 45 percent of the Rams' 60 plays went for zero or negative yards -- the second highest percentage for the Rams in a game this season, after their 15-6 loss to the Bears in Week 14.


Also, the Rams only ran 22 plays in the first half (aside from special teams plays) vs. 44 for NE.

They had 6 drives in the first half that all ended in punts.

They started the first 5 drives with running plays. People say they should have run more, but they weren't having much success running and when you're not getting first downs you're not running very many plays.

Pressure.

Yes Polian estimated that the Patz beat the Rams OL 70% of the time.

On direct qb pressure. This number is from Vinny Bonsignore and his last q & a.

Quote

Of his 42 dropbacks he was pressured 18 times and, in those situations, he was 4 of 14 for 47 yards, a pick, and sacked four times.

That's direct pressure on 42.8% of his attempts. That is a lot.

So the question I always ask remains relevant...how many qbs play well under that much pressure? (Don't lose sight of this. 42% is a lot.)

When not under pressure he was 15 of 24 for 182 yards.

It's a shame btw that the Rams were reduced to relying on Cooks that way because he is not a complete receiver. He's not a go-to guy who makes contested catches. He's far more than a fast one-trick pony but he's not the guy who should have been the main weapon, which was all due to circumstances--the Patz doubled Woods and consciously worked to take him out of the game.
(
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Vikings Jared Goff v Bears/Pats Jared Goff

Speed_Kills516February 08, 2019 05:53PM

  completely disagree

zn220February 08, 2019 06:14PM

  Re:Goff is the SAME...the circumstances changed--Peyton Manning Comp

Steve125February 08, 2019 11:07PM

  Re: Good points both of you

Speed_Kills123February 09, 2019 04:49AM

  Re: Good points both of you

zn96February 09, 2019 06:17AM

  Facts are not relevant

waterfield74February 09, 2019 09:17AM

  Re: sort of like Gurley being too hurt to contribute

Speed_Kills82February 09, 2019 10:46AM

  I think that's true, he was too hurt to play 100%

zn47February 09, 2019 11:48AM

  we're approaching this differently W

zn72February 09, 2019 11:49AM

  Re: Good points both of you

RamsFanSinceLA44February 12, 2019 07:32AM

  not many QBs can do well when they are one dimensional

ferragamo7998February 08, 2019 06:25PM

  Re: Vikings Jared Goff v Bears/Pats Jared Goff Attachments

Ram49140February 08, 2019 06:31PM

  Michael Irvin on Inside the NFL

RamBill163February 08, 2019 07:07PM

  Fantastic breakdown, thanks

Ram49108February 08, 2019 07:27PM

  Re: Michael Irvin on Inside the NFL

zn154February 08, 2019 08:50PM

  Yep cant do that if Kupp is there

Hazlet Hacksaw91February 09, 2019 05:09AM

  If cooks makes those catches

PHDram103February 09, 2019 04:25AM

  Exactly

Ram4979February 09, 2019 08:07AM

  Re: Cooks

Speed_Kills125February 09, 2019 04:55AM

  I don’t think he’s top 10.......

Rampage2K-155February 08, 2019 07:53PM

  Re: top 5?

Speed_Kills103February 09, 2019 05:10AM

  Re: top 5?

Rams4372February 09, 2019 06:04AM

  Re: it’s ok 43 we can disagree on where he slots

Speed_Kills55February 09, 2019 08:18AM

  Re: it’s ok 43 we can disagree on where he slots

Rams4353February 09, 2019 08:23AM

  Re: Yup

Speed_Kills50February 09, 2019 08:34AM

  no way do I put Cam Newton

ferragamo7955February 09, 2019 07:10AM

  Re: ok but I bet you more people

Speed_Kills47February 09, 2019 08:32AM

  we will have a better idea

ferragamo7943February 09, 2019 02:54PM

  Re: yeah its killing me

Speed_Kills43February 09, 2019 05:00PM

  Re: we will have a better idea

AlbaNY_Ram42February 10, 2019 04:58AM

  Re: top 5? Why not? NFL.com has him 5th ranked also....

Rampage2K-97February 09, 2019 08:44AM

  Re: top 5? Why not? NFL.com has him 5th ranked also....

Rams4351February 09, 2019 09:03AM

  Re: top 5? Why not? NFL.com has him 5th ranked also....

Rampage2K-58February 09, 2019 09:18AM

  This might make you feel better.......Tom Brady's 7 worst games

Rampage2K-80February 09, 2019 09:21AM

  Re: top 5?

dzrams48February 09, 2019 09:34AM

  I rate him top 8- top 10 at worst

LMU9348February 09, 2019 01:15PM

  Re: I rate him top 8- top 10 at worst

Speed_Kills49February 09, 2019 05:02PM

  I'll be a little bit vague here...

LMU93114February 10, 2019 04:10AM

  Re: I'll be a little bit vague here...

zn44February 10, 2019 05:54AM

  Re: Good list.

Speed_Kills51February 10, 2019 06:50AM

  Re: Good list.

Rampage2K-63February 10, 2019 07:56AM

  Re: Good list.

dzrams42February 10, 2019 08:57AM

  Ryan did have an advantage early

zn41February 10, 2019 09:22AM

  Re: Idk

Speed_Kills48February 10, 2019 09:41AM

  Re: Idk

zn67February 10, 2019 10:12AM

  Re: im not talking about having a bad game

Speed_Kills54February 10, 2019 10:57AM

  Re: im not talking about having a bad game

dzrams42February 10, 2019 11:15AM

  Re: Thx dz. now we are talking

Speed_Kills50February 10, 2019 11:58AM

  Re: im not talking about having a bad game

zn38February 10, 2019 11:39AM

  Re: im not talking about having a bad game

dzrams39February 10, 2019 12:29PM

  Re: im not talking about having a bad game

zn37February 10, 2019 01:15PM

  Re: Idk

GroundPounder66February 10, 2019 04:06PM

  Re: Idk

zn53February 10, 2019 04:24PM

  Re: Idk

GroundPounder46February 10, 2019 05:07PM

  Re: Idk

zn45February 10, 2019 05:14PM

  Re: Idk

Rams4347February 11, 2019 07:30AM

  Goff has a winning record against your list of QBs

JoeMad66February 12, 2019 07:56AM

  top 10 QB with McVay Gurley Kupp

Rams_8188February 09, 2019 12:33PM

  Goff v Vikings highlights

Speed_Kills54February 10, 2019 07:27AM

  Step back for a while

max87February 10, 2019 11:59AM

  Re: Step back for a while

Rampage2K-73February 10, 2019 03:04PM

  Re: good stuff max

Speed_Kills50February 11, 2019 06:11AM

  Re: good stuff max

Rams4343February 11, 2019 07:36AM

  Speed....

zn58February 12, 2019 02:36PM

  I dunno Speed

max44February 12, 2019 01:06PM