Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...

January 11, 2018 05:56AM
People seem to be ready to make critical changes...namely reductions to the Rams team. I cannot understand that line of thinking.

We are not far away from a Super Bowl contender.

Letting Johnson or Watkins walk...or both with be a step backwards for this team unless they sign individuals better than both. What is that likelihood?

Many on this board are adverse to paying players. Sometimes it seems there is more interest in lining up draft picks and saving dollars than building a Super Bowl contender/winner. It's nice to see the team do well as one of the youngest teams in the league. But the reality is that is not a recipe for winning it all. Experience matters...please review Falcons vs. Rams 1/6/18.

Let's keep contributors. Obviously if someone offers stupid money to these players, we won't go there. But, if we are talking $1+ million diff, then sign them and build. We have our QB at a bargain for at least 3 more years.

Austin was not a contributor...he was a cog that can be replaced. Watkins had 8 TDs on a mere 39 receptions. While not at the quantity we desire, it is at the quality we need. He was our only red zone threat. He was the only one good enough to use his physicality/size to matter. Whether you buy it or not, Goff missed an open, dare I say wide Watkins on many occassions, choosing to check down. If/when Goff grows and works more with Watkins, I can see that TD total to be in double digits with another 30+ receptions. Actually, I'm worried more about Watkins health than ability...which I think he has mounds of.

Johnson played solid and often covered the other team's #1. While Julio Jones caught a lot of short passes, he couldn't get deep. Johnson isn't the best in the league but he is big, physical, plays well and has held up health wise. Letting him go and drafting a corner would just...be stupid...unless we know we're hitting on a Lattimore...and there is no way to know that. We know what we have in Johnson and he is a significant gear in the success of this defense.

How do we maintain and improve?

Add players to complete the transition to a 3-4 from a 4-3.
Sign Johnson.
Sign Watkins.
Strongly consider keeping Quinn at a lower cost.
Add some depth to the OL.
Sign a number of the RFAs
Do our best to sign Donald long term.
Anticipate growth with Goff.

And finally, for the umpteenth time...based on the type of QB I see in Goff, he would go to the next level with the right TE. A solid TE is how you build the team to go to the next level...not tear it down.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/11/2018 05:58AM by jemach.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

RamBill906January 10, 2018 05:10AM

  Well, Rams did with TruJ.

RockRam272January 10, 2018 05:23AM

  Re: Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

LMU93278January 10, 2018 05:58AM

  Re: Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

Headslap75340January 10, 2018 06:02AM

  Nope. No compensation for losing Sammy with Transition tag.

RockRam285January 10, 2018 06:10AM

  Re: Nope. No compensation for losing Sammy with Transition tag.

Headslap75283January 10, 2018 06:27AM

  Re: Its going to be tricky

Speed_Kills267January 10, 2018 06:38AM

  Re: Its going to be tricky

PHDram282January 10, 2018 07:49AM

  Re: I will say

Speed_Kills225January 10, 2018 09:44AM

  Re: I will say

oldschoolramfan396January 10, 2018 10:04AM

  lol

PHDram221January 10, 2018 10:27AM

  Re: lol

bigjimram21342January 10, 2018 11:33PM

  Re: Same thing I was saying........

oldschoolramfan205January 11, 2018 07:31AM

  Can't do that

AlbaNY_Ram370January 11, 2018 12:08AM

  You know, that non-exclusive tag makes a ton of sense to me...

Rams43305January 10, 2018 07:01AM

  Assuming the Franchise Tag cost about $16M/yr....

RAMbler284January 10, 2018 07:41AM

  Re: Assuming the Franchise Tag cost about $16M/yr....

oldschoolramfan339January 10, 2018 07:45AM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

merlin236January 10, 2018 09:19AM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

PHDram222January 10, 2018 01:22PM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

SoCalRAMatic314January 10, 2018 02:53PM

  trouble with transition tag

Anonymous User226January 10, 2018 10:59PM

  Re: oh I didn't realize that... do you mean the franchise tag? nm

Speed_Kills302January 10, 2018 09:46AM

  They both carry the same cost

AlbaNY_Ram260January 11, 2018 12:13AM

  Re: They both carry the same cost

Rams43303January 11, 2018 06:15AM

  Re: You know, that non-exclusive tag makes a ton of sense to me...

bigjimram21238January 10, 2018 11:46PM

  5 reasons to lock up Watkins

qwords271January 11, 2018 03:59AM

  Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

RockRam252January 11, 2018 04:50AM

  Re: Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

oldschoolramfan221January 11, 2018 05:06AM

  Re: Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

AlbaNY_Ram227January 11, 2018 05:25AM

  The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...

jemach243January 11, 2018 05:56AM

  Not so. It is exactly as Snead said: "saving dollars" is not the intent

RockRam260January 11, 2018 07:08AM

  Re: The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...Winner jemach.

oldschoolramfan233January 11, 2018 07:39AM

  +1 Je

ferragamo79198January 11, 2018 07:52AM

  Re: The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...

AlbaNY_Ram228January 11, 2018 09:12AM