QuotePHDram You wont give it up. Huh? Maybe choose your timing better.by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteJamesJM how I misread your subject title on first glance. - JamesJMby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteAlbaNY_Ram I think Wade's defense is supposed to put immediate pressure on the QB and force the ball out quickly. Having the CBS playing press coverage dovetails nicely in that scheme. I'm not sure having Peters playing 10 yards off his guy is a good plan if the idea is to force a quick pass. Peters' guy will always be the hot read (although perhaps this would prevent another 72 yard TD).by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteHazlet Hacksaw Woods was surrounded by 3 guys - great play by the up guy. Goff was dealing Sunday - but that throw shouldn't have been made. Those throws are his bread and butter.by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteSpeed_Kills Good sicussion overall about the NFC with the Rams and Saints being the big dogs and the others chasing them. They say the conference is still wide open with Carolina and the Falcons lurking. The comments on Peters are very interesting Wade is going to have to change it up go to 3:11 mark for Peters discussion. We've been all trying to figure it out - is he still injurby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotedzrams QuoteSuh-weet! Teams are scoring 24 pts/game on average now, up a couple points from last year. But really? 42 points with no "give backs" is what it'd take for you to be satisfied? KC and NO have each given the ball away 8 times, the Pats 13 times. I have no idea how many of those led directly to scores. And they miss field goals, etc. The Broncos in 2013 scored 39/gamby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotedzrams QuoteSuh-weet! Quotedzrams QuoteRams43 Quotedzrams I wouldn't say our offense was "magnificent." They played well but IMO they left points on the board. They had the opportunity to hang 45 themselves on NO. They didn't. Is 35 points really enough nowadays? There is unprecedented scoring this year. Offenses are better than ever. Against high scoring teams, the Ramsby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteRampage2K- Obviously results will change the outcome of the poll, but IMO I though we should have just took the free points the Saints tried to give us there and take the easy FG. I love Sean's aggressiveness, but I just thought that was the wrong time.... If it backfires it could swing the momentum....and unfortunately it did. Btw, I'm with Troy, Joe and Mike who all thought that waby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteRampage2K- Yeah that was a bad look.... glad Jared feels comfortable enough to try and take control of that moment and that he didn't back down from Saffolds reaction. Dumb play by a smart player...that was a terrible time for that kind of penalty Yup. But, more than anything, I thought it was really telling - in a REALLY good way - that Jared stayed in his face. We also got shots of hiby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotedzrams QuoteRams43 Quotedzrams I wouldn't say our offense was "magnificent." They played well but IMO they left points on the board. They had the opportunity to hang 45 themselves on NO. They didn't. Is 35 points really enough nowadays? There is unprecedented scoring this year. Offenses are better than ever. Against high scoring teams, the Rams may need to put up 40 likeby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteLMU93 ... that this game in week 10 really is to wrap up the division. Rams win would put them at 9-1 and Hawks at 4-5. Hawks winning out would put them at 11-5. We're a few wins/Hawks' losses away from wrapping up the division, but winning next week would go a long way, for sure.by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quote21Dog QuoteDrew2839 This game reminded me a lot of Big 12 football: back-and-forth scoring, big plays, all offense. Without looking at the stats, I'd say the Saints got a ton of yards after contact. How's that for exact? That might have been the most disappointing aspect of the D's performance yesterday. Scheme has nothing to do with that. There were a TON of missed Rams' tackles.by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteRamsFanSince69 IMHO, of course, but 1. I don't see the Saints playing any better than they did yesterday. They are peaking now, and I'd rather be peaking in weeks 16 & 17 as a prelude to the playoffs. 2. I still expect the Rams to win Home Field Advantage through the playoffs. NO will lose to Carolina and someone else. 3. The Rams showed great fortitude in coming back from 21 poinby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteJYB Yeah, the defense stank out loud, but I think Talib might've made a difference on a number of those Aint third down conversions, Secondary misses him big time and I think he'll make a big difference down the stretch. Not just in his playing ability, but in his leadership in the secondary. Certainly, if he's able to recover fully and knock the rust off by the end of the regular seasonby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotedzrams QuoteCraigMatson That was great agility no doubt . He probably made a huge statement on his behalf on future contract with Rams or other team. Very solid RB who has excellent power ,good feet as runner and solid receiving ability. The announcers said that he was good enough to start for Most teams. That's very high praise. That's the first I've heard him get public recognitioby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteCraigMatson Honestly I think the reason has to do with run support . The corners don't appear schemed to support the run D as much as safeties are. Either Joyner or Johnson are set near line backer zones and have responsibility to watch run first. The CBs are almost always singled up on at least one side . All the opposing QB has to do is find out which side has single coverage andby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteRam_Ruler And there's still a chance this rematch happens in LA Obviously, our Rams need to tighten things up, to say the least. But have you seen Saints' remaining schedule? Cincy 5-3 Eagles 4-4 Atlanta 4-4 Dallas 3-4 Tampa 3-5 Carolina 6-2 Pitt 5-2-1 Carolina 6-2 That's pretty killer, especially w/Atl playing much better now than their .500 record, and the Eagles have lostby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotesacram I'm more concerned that we have a defense that gave up 24 first downs, 313 yards and FIVE first half TDs than not getting points on that one drive in the first half. I understand your argument, but the Rams pathetic first half performance on defense makes the argument for going for it completely justifiable. Kind of a bummer that we got robbed by the refs on that play too huh? 3by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotemexram What do you guys think?? Goff just missed.by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
QuoteJamesJM It was a valiant effort... when little was working on D and Brees was being Brees.by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
3 pts yielded in 24 2nd-half min. And how about a LOT of love for the offense? We haven't punted YET.by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
Quotereggae So don't get behind by 22 again WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
Quotestlramz :partytime Wut I sed wuz.... WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
QuoteMamaRAMa where they didn't reach the redzone and come away with points!by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
QuoteRamFanInPA . ... not so much.by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
QuoteMamaRAMa hasn't had much room to run today Which means lots of 2nd downs when it's clear Rams have to pass. JG having to throw into a lot of tight windows. And he's DOING it.by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
Quotestlramz Everything’s saints fan looking at the score board and wondering how it’s this close giving the uttter domination of the first half It’s going to get worse saints fans! It certainly can. This team has shown tremendous ability to adjust at halftime. Let's. Go. RAMS!!!!by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
QuoteMamaRAMa looked like he was shoving on Ingram when he was on the ground ..... PLS don't do that, NRC!by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum