September 25, 2016 02:02PM
Agreed. Throw that play out of the book.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Why go for 2 here?

RFIP523September 25, 2016 02:01PM

  Re: Why go for 2 here?

The_Zone334September 25, 2016 02:02PM

  Made zero sence!!

RFIP277September 25, 2016 02:03PM

  Re: Why go for 2 here?

dzrams294September 25, 2016 02:02PM

  Re: Why go for 2 here?

stlramz251September 25, 2016 02:03PM

  What????

RFIP273September 25, 2016 02:04PM

  Re: On 2nd thought...

dzrams293September 25, 2016 02:04PM

  Re: Why go for 2 here?

CROMWELL21440September 25, 2016 02:02PM

  Re: Why go for 2 here?

CROMWELL21278September 25, 2016 02:03PM

  EXACTLY!!! Nm

RFIP230September 25, 2016 02:04PM

  Re: Why go for 2 here?

ramfan76t346September 25, 2016 02:02PM

  because they will play soft on the next possesion nm

Hazlet Hacksaw251September 25, 2016 02:02PM

  Because fish is stupid

stlramz259September 25, 2016 02:03PM

  Re: Why go for 2 here?

RamsDynasty252September 25, 2016 02:03PM

  Mind-bogglingly bad call!

Suh-weet!254September 25, 2016 02:03PM

  Fisher's pay should be docked $1 million for that decision

PeoriaRa266September 25, 2016 03:19PM

  VERY stupid

The Professor244September 25, 2016 03:24PM