Classical wrote "Didn't Tom Brady win for years with second and third rate receivers? I wonder if no one wants to play with Rodgers. Adams seemed like he couldn't get away from GB fast enough."
I don't recall when... maybe it's just me, but looking back, I don't recall Brady not having good receivers. They occupied different positions, not all were wideouts, but he had people to throw to and OC game planners who could coach to the skills of the players. Like every good QB, then, Brady brought out of their potential. The spotlight, though, is on Brady.
Some fans ask: who did Dan Marino have? He did it without good receivers. Same argument. Marino got a lot of spotlight time; the Marks brothers, Clayton and Dupree, were pretty good.
It takes both partners to dance. We see that on our team. Kupp, despiter his talent ad potential, looked only as good as Goff could make him look, which was pretty good, and Stafford elevated his play.
