Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Article:Jimmy Garoppolo’s no-trade clause means nothing

August 29, 2022 06:14PM
[profootballtalk.nbcsports.com] Jimmy Garoppolo’s no-trade clause means nothing
Posted by Mike Florio on August 29, 2022, 8:50 PM EDT

NFC Wild Card Playoffs - San Francisco 49ers v Dallas Cowboys
Getty Images
Much is always made of quarterbacks who have no-trade clauses. Nothing should ever be made of it.

The latest example of a no-trade clause being meaningless comes via the no-trade clause included in Jimmy Garoppolo‘s revised contract. Even if the new deal didn’t include one, no team would be trading for Garoppolo if he didn’t want to play for that team.

For other positions, it’s easier to treat a player like a piece of a machine. For quarterback, it’s very hard to want a guy who doesn’t want to be wanted.

A trade will happen only if a starter with another team suffers an injury, if that team wants Garoppolo, if that team is willing to give the 49ers what they want for Garoppolo, and if Garoppolo wants to go. The team won’t make an investment on a part-year rental for Garoppolo if he doesn’t want to step in and replace the injured starter.

Before today, when he didn’t have a no-trade clause, Garoppolo essentially had a no-trade clause, because no one was trading for his $25.62 million salary. While it may be more attractive for a team to trade for a contract with $6.5 million guaranteed and an upside north of $15 million, it makes no sense to twist Garoppolo’s left arm to throw the ball with his right arm.

That applies to any starting quarterback. A no-trade clause means nothing because a team wants nothing to do with a guy who doesn’t want to be there. Even without a no-trade clause, Garoppolo wasn’t getting traded if he didn’t want to be.

But with Garoppolo taking a dramatic pay cut for 2021, the least they could do is throw in a no-trade clause.

The far more valuable term for Garoppolo is the decision not to apply the franchise tag in 2023. No matter what he or the 49ers do this year, Garoppolo is heading for the open market in March. And if: (1) he plays; and (2) they get to the Super Bowl, he’ll cash in without limitation or restriction.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  49ers rework Jimmy Garoppolo's deal to stay in San Francisco; contract includes no-trade clause

BerendsenRam355August 29, 2022 02:02PM

  Only $6 M???????

NewMexicoRam178August 29, 2022 02:17PM

  Article: 49ers, Jimmy Garoppolo find an unexpected win-win

BerendsenRam163August 29, 2022 02:47PM

  JG "couldn't do better" than $6M ?!?!?!?!?

NewMexicoRam149August 29, 2022 04:59PM

  Re: 49ers rework Jimmy Garoppolo's deal to stay in San Francisco; contract includes no-trade clause

Classicalwit114August 29, 2022 03:38PM

  Don't understand....wasnt he scheduled to make $24 million

ferragamo79231August 29, 2022 03:41PM

  That's what I was asking

NewMexicoRam117August 29, 2022 05:00PM

  I kind of respect this move

RantoulRam122August 29, 2022 05:08PM

  Article:Jimmy Garoppolo’s no-trade clause means nothing

BerendsenRam144August 29, 2022 06:14PM

  Re: Article:Jimmy Garoppolo’s no-trade clause means nothing

Classicalwit98August 30, 2022 05:06AM

  translation- Trey Lance sucks

Rampage2K-121August 29, 2022 10:48PM

  Re: translation- Trey Lance sucks

BerendsenRam150August 30, 2022 08:21AM

  Deebo's status sure has been quiet. Did they ever sign him long term?

Ramgator88August 30, 2022 03:24AM

  Re: Yes

DomerRam82August 30, 2022 08:41AM