Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

The OL ought to be fine in 2021, it's 2022 that raises the issues

July 08, 2021 07:54AM
Quote
sstrams
Then we've probably set ourselves back a while.. I just have this bad feeling their reluctance to bolstering the O line is gonna bite us in the butt.. and potentially get Stafford hurt.. and then we're really screwed..

This year ought to be fine. That's assuming that Corbett is fine at center (and until I hear different, I do assume that). It's also assuming then whether or not Evans is good enough, they have depth behind him (the guys we've heard things about are Anchrum and Brewer). In case Whitworth misses games, Noteboom did play at LOT last year and while not great he wasn't a big liability.

Ah but--2022.

Word is Whitworth is retiring after 2021. Who replaces him?

Noteboom may rise to the occasion but then he's a free agent, and if he doesn't improve to the point of being considered a franchise LOT, do you pay him? If you don't pay him, then, you need to replace him. Problem is it's hard to replace a left OT. Low draft picks really can't be counted on. Maybe they can trade up to round 1 where the pickings are better, or maybe in 2022 there's a good trade or a free agent (things you usually cannot count on).

Corbett is a free agent too. Assuming he works out, he will command full grown 2nd contract money. If he doesn't work out (though I think he will) they need to find a center. That would be finding a center on top of tending to the LOT position.

I think they have candidates for both ROG and ROT, which means that Hav could be expendable. He might be expendable because they could use the cap space and as a rule a team doesn't want to pay 3 big contracts on the OL...if it gets to 3. Even if it doesn't get to 3 the cap is tight, and if you can replace Hav it helps you pay Corbett.

Short version: there are big OL issues in 2022 but 2021 ought to be fine.

...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/08/2021 08:00AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  For those who still don't care for acquiring Stafford, a cool article

RockRam564July 07, 2021 07:51AM

  Re: For those who still don't care for acquiring Stafford, a cool article

oldmanram194July 07, 2021 08:11AM

  Great read, Rockā€¦

Rams43199July 07, 2021 08:27AM

  Makes me Feel Even Better.

den-the-coach155July 07, 2021 08:41AM

  +1

NewMexicoRam144July 07, 2021 09:17AM

  +2

BC Ramsfan148July 07, 2021 09:56AM

  Well, my worry is this...

JamesJM285July 07, 2021 08:55AM

  Re: Well, my worry is this...

den-the-coach236July 07, 2021 09:16AM

  Well, easy reply...

JamesJM157July 07, 2021 09:19AM

  Re: Well, easy reply...

stlramz136July 07, 2021 12:05PM

  Re: Well, my worry is this...

Hram190July 07, 2021 01:01PM

  how many really don't care for acquiring Stafford?

zn189July 07, 2021 09:21AM

  Re: how many really don't care for acquiring Stafford?

Rampage2K-150July 07, 2021 09:40AM

  Re: how many really don't care for acquiring Stafford?

zn140July 07, 2021 10:12AM

  I think most dissenters are concerned about cost not the player

stlramz129July 07, 2021 12:09PM

  Yeah, I can agree with that..

sstrams123July 07, 2021 12:18PM

  Re: Yeah, I can agree with that..

Rampage2K-117July 07, 2021 12:30PM

  If he doesn't...

sstrams108July 08, 2021 07:40AM

  The OL ought to be fine in 2021, it's 2022 that raises the issues

zn112July 08, 2021 07:54AM

  I kinda wished they would have drafted an LT this year..

sstrams151July 08, 2021 09:56AM

  Perhaps. It's not my memory of it. But... all "costs" are relative

RockRam174July 07, 2021 12:45PM

  Re: I think most dissenters are concerned about cost not the player

zn279July 07, 2021 01:06PM