Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Remember when Brock signed elsewhere b4 failing physical

February 18, 2021 07:28AM
Quote
stlramz
AD99 was bummed. I bet he will gladly restructures if it is necessary to keep big Mike by his side.

I think we keep Brock one more year and then move on like LMU mentions.

If what you mean by "restructure" is give back money, no one ever does that (or it's so rare it amounts to nada).

The way restructuring works in the NFL, though, a player can shift money around in their contract, moving hits to future years. They get the same amount it's just structured differently. That might help short term but it adds up long term.

I don't know if you were doing this, but I see some people use the word "restructure" to mean a player gives money back, but that's not really what the word means.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Morgan Fox emerges as key piece in DL rotation...

Rams43445February 17, 2021 07:28AM

  Trade Brockers, sign Fox?

promomasterj173February 17, 2021 08:34AM

  Re: Trade Brockers, sign Fox?

Rams43197February 17, 2021 09:45AM

  Re: Trade Brockers, sign Fox?

LMU93177February 17, 2021 10:12AM

  I understand the cap problem, but IMO we should be able to keep Brockers...

roman18150February 17, 2021 02:21PM

  Re: I understand the cap problem, but IMO we should be able to keep Brockers...

Rams43125February 17, 2021 02:44PM

  Remember when Brock signed elsewhere b4 failing physical

stlramz122February 18, 2021 07:20AM

  Re: Remember when Brock signed elsewhere b4 failing physical

zn118February 18, 2021 07:28AM

  Re: Remember when Brock signed elsewhere b4 failing physical

stlramz174February 18, 2021 08:43AM

  I would not restructure Brockers

LMU93143February 18, 2021 08:49AM

  Re: I would not restructure Brockers

stlramz136February 18, 2021 09:13AM