Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I understand the cap problem, but IMO we should be able to keep Brockers...

February 17, 2021 02:44PM
Quote
roman18
They have ways to alleviate the problem for a1 year without dumping all these players. Some will go, JJ, and Floyd....Hill......I just think that Brockers is a guy who seems to be under valued for some reason. Every year you hear....trade him etc......He IMO is a real heartbeat for this D.....I just don't see the +'s of him gone vs. his cap #......To me he is that important.....if we went out and got Matt to go all in again, then we need to keep Broc and work around the cap #.

It’s not that the Rams don’t like and value Brockers. It’s more that they may want another player at another position even more and need the Brockers cap money to get that other missing piece.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Morgan Fox emerges as key piece in DL rotation...

Rams43444February 17, 2021 07:28AM

  Trade Brockers, sign Fox?

promomasterj172February 17, 2021 08:34AM

  Re: Trade Brockers, sign Fox?

Rams43196February 17, 2021 09:45AM

  Re: Trade Brockers, sign Fox?

LMU93176February 17, 2021 10:12AM

  I understand the cap problem, but IMO we should be able to keep Brockers...

roman18149February 17, 2021 02:21PM

  Re: I understand the cap problem, but IMO we should be able to keep Brockers...

Rams43124February 17, 2021 02:44PM

  Remember when Brock signed elsewhere b4 failing physical

stlramz122February 18, 2021 07:20AM

  Re: Remember when Brock signed elsewhere b4 failing physical

zn118February 18, 2021 07:28AM

  Re: Remember when Brock signed elsewhere b4 failing physical

stlramz174February 18, 2021 08:43AM

  I would not restructure Brockers

LMU93142February 18, 2021 08:49AM

  Re: I would not restructure Brockers

stlramz135February 18, 2021 09:13AM