May 16, 2020 05:26PM
Quote
zn
Quote
max
True, they have the same number of feet.

Apparently.

huh. i actually thought you were saying they had the same shoe size. never thought about the number of feet each had as max took it. hmmm.

Quote
zn
Here's something else on him:
from Rob Rang: . . . his 10-yard split was a full tenth of a second faster (1.47) than any other back who ran at this year’s Combine

after pouring over combine stats for years now, i think a 1.47 10 yard split is pretty special for a man of his weight. and a full 10th faster than anyone else at that combine? wow. would love to know what his 3 cone drill score would've been but based on his 20 yard shuttle and projected 3 cone, he seems to be way up there in change of direction too. i guess this is why some see a faulk comparison.

having spent some time tonight watching cam youtubes, i completely agree cam at the college level looks like roger craig at the professional level - kind of a tough comparison though. i have no idea what craig looked like at the college level {wasn't as into college football or the draft at that time} or any idea what cam will look like at the pro level.

i'm really high on cam and very hopeful ~ it's fun to draw comparisons but i just think comparisons to a pair of hall-of-famers is way too premature and unfair to cam. if cam comes anywhere close to either of them we'll all be ecstatic. hope he does....

i spent more time tonight watching interviews with cam than highlights. my impression is the kid is genuinely humble. not an i guy but a true we guy. came away from listening to him talk impressed. i think the fo chose wisely.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Cam Akers= Freeman McNeil

Steve959May 16, 2020 01:39AM

  Re: Cam Akers= Freeman McNeil

David Deacon344May 16, 2020 02:48AM

  Re: Cam Akers= Freeman McNeil

Steve282May 16, 2020 06:34AM

  Re: Cam Akers= Poor mans Faulk

Rampage2K-326May 16, 2020 09:48AM

  not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

max228May 16, 2020 09:55AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn227May 16, 2020 09:57AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

max201May 16, 2020 10:02AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn202May 16, 2020 10:16AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

max176May 16, 2020 10:50AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn200May 16, 2020 10:56AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

max175May 16, 2020 01:19PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn279May 16, 2020 03:53PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

george_allen211May 16, 2020 05:26PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn165May 16, 2020 05:29PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

Classicalwit198May 16, 2020 11:15AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

Rampage2K-343May 16, 2020 12:14PM

  Faulk was a 4.3 guy

max188May 16, 2020 01:23PM

  Looked it up yes, in the 4.3 range

JimYoungblood53184May 16, 2020 01:30PM

  Re: Looked it up yes, in the 4.3 range

max180May 16, 2020 01:46PM

  Re: Faulk was a 4.5 guy in 2001--but MVM (mvp mind)

Steve164May 16, 2020 10:59PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

reggae169May 16, 2020 07:06PM

  i'm still partial to DeAngelo Williams myself

Deadpool239May 16, 2020 04:45PM

  CBS Sports had him 3rd ranked RB in draft- podcast link

Rampage2K-260May 16, 2020 06:48PM