Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

May 16, 2020 05:29PM
good post

Quote
george_allen
Quote
zn
Here's something else on him:
from Rob Rang: . . . his 10-yard split was a full tenth of a second faster (1.47) than any other back who ran at this year’s Combine

after pouring over combine stats for years now, i think a 1.47 10 yard split is pretty special for a man of his weight. and a full 10th faster than anyone else at that combine? wow. would love to know what his 3 cone drill score would've been but based on his 20 yard shuttle and projected 3 cone, he seems to be way up there in change of direction too. i guess this is why some see a faulk comparison.

having spent some time tonight watching cam youtubes, i completely agree cam at the college level looks like roger craig at the professional level - kind of a tough comparison though. i have no idea what craig looked like at the college level {wasn't as into college football or the draft at that time} or any idea what cam will look like at the pro level.

i'm really high on cam and very hopeful ~ it's fun to draw comparisons but i just think comparisons to a pair of hall-of-famers is way too premature and unfair to cam. if cam comes anywhere close to either of them we'll all be ecstatic. hope he does....

i spent more time tonight watching interviews with cam than highlights. my impression is the kid is genuinely humble. not an i guy but a true we guy. came away from listening to him talk impressed. i think the fo chose wisely.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Cam Akers= Freeman McNeil

Steve951May 16, 2020 01:39AM

  Re: Cam Akers= Freeman McNeil

David Deacon342May 16, 2020 02:48AM

  Re: Cam Akers= Freeman McNeil

Steve281May 16, 2020 06:34AM

  Re: Cam Akers= Poor mans Faulk

Rampage2K-317May 16, 2020 09:48AM

  not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

max226May 16, 2020 09:55AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn224May 16, 2020 09:57AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

max199May 16, 2020 10:02AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn201May 16, 2020 10:16AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

max174May 16, 2020 10:50AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn198May 16, 2020 10:56AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

max174May 16, 2020 01:19PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn277May 16, 2020 03:53PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

george_allen210May 16, 2020 05:26PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

zn164May 16, 2020 05:29PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

Classicalwit196May 16, 2020 11:15AM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

Rampage2K-342May 16, 2020 12:14PM

  Faulk was a 4.3 guy

max186May 16, 2020 01:23PM

  Looked it up yes, in the 4.3 range

JimYoungblood53183May 16, 2020 01:30PM

  Re: Looked it up yes, in the 4.3 range

max178May 16, 2020 01:46PM

  Re: Faulk was a 4.5 guy in 2001--but MVM (mvp mind)

Steve160May 16, 2020 10:59PM

  Re: not Faulk, but maybe Roger Craig

reggae168May 16, 2020 07:06PM

  i'm still partial to DeAngelo Williams myself

Deadpool236May 16, 2020 04:45PM

  CBS Sports had him 3rd ranked RB in draft- podcast link

Rampage2K-258May 16, 2020 06:48PM