Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: why are the 3 you mention the only other options?

March 09, 2020 09:27AM
I just think he is not a bad 3rd to 4th option he has playing experience and has produced in games. Not to mention being in the system for 3 years with McVays offense. He has started 11 games and has 7tds not bad when you start comparing to our current receivers, that besides Kupp haven't been very red zone savy. Thats his role in the offense as a bigger or taller body to compete in the zone. He ran a 4.56 which is not blazing but for his height above average. He is by no means a polished superstar but he has value if he can get better at tracking and attacking jump balls. As far as Webster goes I can't see any thing to get excited about and his lack of playing time confirms that with me. If you make plays you get opportunities. We can always improve our receiver room but let me know who we can replace him with a 4th 5th round pedigree from draft or free agent salary wise that's an upgrade. In all honesty we don't won't to see Reynolds on the field this year because Kupp, Woods, Cooks, Everett, Higbee would be a better choice.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Would it make sense to trade Josh Reynolds?

promomasterj683March 06, 2020 07:13AM

  Re: Would it make sense to trade Josh Reynolds?

cool_hand_luke323March 06, 2020 08:11AM

  I ride him out and replace him next year with late round pick

Rams_81254March 06, 2020 08:25AM

  well ...

alyoshamucci368March 06, 2020 09:00AM

  really? site I looked at site that says Reynolds would be 4-6 year

Rams_81258March 06, 2020 10:15AM

  Re: One important consideration...

merlin155March 08, 2020 01:56PM

  He is not Cooks' insurance policy

promomasterj199March 09, 2020 07:44AM

  Re: He is not Cooks' insurance policy

merlin276March 09, 2020 08:11AM

  Re: He is not Cooks' insurance policy

Rams43138March 09, 2020 08:32AM

  They had to move Woods into the slot

promomasterj296March 09, 2020 09:05AM

  having Reynolds is more valuable than trading him

LMU93192March 06, 2020 10:45AM

  Re: having Reynolds is more valuable than trading him

CraigMatson171March 06, 2020 11:02AM

  Re: having Reynolds is more valuable than trading him

LMU93316March 06, 2020 11:14AM

  If his size is such a matchup problem why isn't he starting?

promomasterj157March 09, 2020 07:42AM

  as long as Reynolds is a minimum salary player I stay the course

Rams_81152March 10, 2020 08:49AM

  the Vikes must be kicking themselves for the Higbee deal...

SunTzu_vs_Camus163March 08, 2020 01:45PM

  Re: the Vikes must be kicking themselves for the Higbee deal...

nicecatchellard176March 09, 2020 08:16AM

  why are the 3 you mention the only other options?

promomasterj156March 09, 2020 09:07AM

  Re: why are the 3 you mention the only other options?

nicecatchellard131March 09, 2020 09:27AM

  Re: why are the 3 you mention the only other options?

Rams43126March 09, 2020 09:28AM

  WR depth

LMU93113March 10, 2020 09:38AM

  I'd keep him especially with injury history

ferragamo79155March 06, 2020 03:07PM

  Re: Would it make sense to trade Josh Reynolds?

rampage666273March 08, 2020 02:37PM

  You're basing his trade value on what metric?

promomasterj233March 10, 2020 10:02AM

  Swap for cheaper with higher ceiling?

promomasterj155March 09, 2020 07:38AM

  they aren't going to spend a high pick on a WR IMHO

ferragamo79162March 10, 2020 08:52AM

  Re: they aren't going to spend a high pick on a WR IMHO

LMU93124March 10, 2020 09:32AM