January 09, 2020 05:21PM
The current lawsuit is over who should have to pay what for the cleanup that has already taken place.

The article isn't crystal clear about that though, perhaps due to the incompetence of journalists, but also because you get more clicks by implying danger than by describing an insurance lawsuit.

And in any case, you'd probably have to eat the soil or drink water that had been in the soil to get arsenic poisoning. Not just be in the general vicinity.

eye rolling smiley



Ramily!
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Arsenic contaminated soil at the new stadium?

waterfield770January 09, 2020 04:37PM

  As I read the article, the contaminated soil is gone.

Saguaro417January 09, 2020 05:21PM

  Re: As I read the article, the contaminated soil is gone.

Ohiorams315January 10, 2020 02:22AM

  Re: As I read the article, the contaminated soil is gone.

max292January 10, 2020 02:57AM

  I read the whole story, in the LA Times.

Saguaro339January 10, 2020 06:30AM

  Re: I read the whole story, in the LA Times.

Ohiorams225January 10, 2020 06:49AM

  Oh.

Saguaro278January 10, 2020 06:55AM

  Re: I read the whole story, in the LA Times.

RamsFanSinceLA232January 10, 2020 08:52AM

  Re: Arsenic contaminated soil at the new stadium?

HADL21336January 10, 2020 06:11AM

  much ado about nothing

21Dog258January 10, 2020 06:42AM