Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Its pretty simple

September 24, 2019 03:55PM
Quote
Deadpool
The 6 man front the Browns ran basically singled up their DEs on our OTs, DTs on our OGs, NT on OC and a LB on the line against our TE. That singles up everyone and allowed their MLB to make a play on the RB.

So if there are 7 in the box (6 on line and 1 mlb) that singles up your WRs so its shotgun or 3 drop steps for your QB and quick passes. Forget outside runs because that defense is designed to stretch you out and allow the the LBer to make a play. Forget screens in the middle of the field, you have 12 or 3 guys muddling up that area. RB wheel routes, esp with a quick back (Henderson?). Using a 2nd TE like a H back as a lead blocker can work to blow up that MLB or to get out in front on a sweep. Inside tackle runs can work if you can get a hat on the mlber somehow.

The other thing you can try is to force them out of the double eagle front by going 2 by 2 WR sets. You are singling up WRs so run some rub routes and a bunch of short passes to soften them up for the deep stuff. Running between the tackles doesn't matter if your run 4 WRs and 0 TEs or 3 and 1 because its between the tackles.

Personally i would run 4 wr 2x2 sets and just set up in shotgun and let Kupp, Woods, and Cooks (and Reynolds) do their thing. And run Gurley and Brown between the tackles and Gurley and henderson on wheel routes to the strong side of the field.

One last thing, not every team is going to have the players to effectively run this defense well. Seattle and SF can. NE can. Cleveland could. TB cannot.

wow. incredibly well thought out. i'm going to have to read this 3 or 4 times before i begin to comprehend this. injecting the receivers to exploit wide 6 makes a ton of sense to me. especially if you can average 3.3 to 4 yards a carry against it running.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  How would YOU scheme against the 6 man fronts the Rams have been seeing?

Ramgator744September 24, 2019 04:27AM

  they're already doing it

zn479September 24, 2019 04:39AM

  Re: excellent post zn

Speed_Kills470September 24, 2019 04:46AM

  here's another

zn302September 24, 2019 05:11AM

  Re: here's another

Ohiorams336September 24, 2019 05:13AM

  Waldman is a great analyst

max369September 24, 2019 06:32AM

  Would adding a FB or another RB help even more?

Ramgator214September 24, 2019 07:58AM

  Thinking the same...

mexram194September 24, 2019 05:41PM

  Re: Would adding a FB or another RB help even more?

zn190September 24, 2019 05:42PM

  Re: Would adding a FB or another RB help even more?

CraigMatson158September 24, 2019 07:37PM

  Re: they're already doing it

Rampage2K-213September 24, 2019 08:05AM

  Re: they're already doing it

CraigMatson163September 24, 2019 03:43PM

  Re: they're already doing it

george_allen199September 24, 2019 03:33PM

  Re: they're already doing it

zn194September 24, 2019 05:22PM

  Re: How would YOU scheme against the 6 man fronts the Rams have been seeing?

Classicalwit262September 24, 2019 04:42AM

  Re: How would YOU scheme against the 6 man fronts the Rams have been seeing?

Ohiorams312September 24, 2019 04:43AM

  Re: a fullback or Hback would be great

Speed_Kills246September 24, 2019 04:47AM

  Re: How would YOU scheme against the 6 man fronts the Rams have been seeing?

stlrams13275September 24, 2019 05:05AM

  Re: How would YOU scheme against the 6 man fronts the Rams have been seeing?

zn283September 24, 2019 05:25AM

  +1

LMU93194September 24, 2019 06:12AM

  Re: my concern is will they do it enough

Speed_Kills215September 24, 2019 06:47AM

  Re: my concern is will they do it enough

zn281September 24, 2019 06:55AM

  Re: I think its a concern

Speed_Kills208September 24, 2019 07:07AM

  Re: How would YOU scheme against the 6 man fronts the Rams have been seeing?

Classicalwit212September 24, 2019 11:45AM

  Its pretty simple

Deadpool328September 24, 2019 09:46AM

  Re: Its pretty simple

george_allen234September 24, 2019 03:55PM

  Re: Its pretty simple

CraigMatson299September 24, 2019 04:42PM

  Logically, if there is only 1 guy behind the DL (6-1)

JimYoungblood53384September 24, 2019 12:25PM