Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

It's the market

May 12, 2019 07:49AM
A couple of things about 2nd contract markets.

1. They always go up.
2. The money a player gets is not a direct measure of his "worth or value or ranking" as a player. To an extent it is, but also--it isn't. Goes like this. The market sets the amount for a given year. And you either want that player or you don't. If you don't someone else pays the market amount. Like last year--Cooks and Watkins both got around 16 M. That's because the market for non-top ranked elite WRs in 2018 was 16 M.

How about CB?

2nd contracts in 2017: Bouye, Trufant, Gilmore, and Rhodes all got between 13 and 14 M. The average was around 13.55 M.

2nd contracts in 2018: Johnson, 14 M.

2nd contracts in 2019: Howard, 15 M.

Howard did NOT set the market for Peters, as the reporting on this would have you believe. Rather, the market set the 2nd contract amount for BOTH Howard AND Peters. In 2019 for CBs that's probably between 15-16 M. It will be more in 2020.

PLUS this was predictable. After the 2017 and 2018 2nd contracts for CBs were signed, the amount for 2019 was simply going to be in the 15-16 M range. Any ideas anyone might have that they could have signed Peters for less than that are just not realistic. That's not how the market works. Remember, if the Rams don't sign Peters for that, someone else will. Same with Watkins and the WR market. That's just how it works,

So. Do you trade a high pick for a player at the end of his rookie contract who will need to be signed soon? And that is, signed soon for AT LEAST 15-16 M? (And it will be more in 2020.) There is no way the Rams would not know that would be the market for CBs in 2019 and 2020--higher than 15 M. That's what they traded for, a guy who would be signing for that come contract time.

...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What Xavien Howard's record extension means for Rams and Marcus Peters

RamBill562May 10, 2019 12:03PM

  Peters would have to play MUCH better to even have this conversation....

SunTzu_vs_Camus207May 10, 2019 12:30PM

  Can't trade him after trade deadline

The Professor214May 10, 2019 12:33PM

  Re: Not really...the conversation has already been had.

dzrams287May 10, 2019 01:02PM

  Re: They talked up Tavon too

merlin205May 10, 2019 10:11PM

  Re: Really?

dzrams151May 11, 2019 01:09PM

  Re: Really?

merlin109May 12, 2019 08:14PM

  Similar to Sammy Watkins

David Deacon186May 11, 2019 06:23AM

  Peters would have to have a stellar year

RockRam131May 11, 2019 06:26AM

  Re: Peters would have to have a stellar year

Rams43159May 11, 2019 07:37AM

  Re: Similar to Sammy Watkins

LMU93147May 12, 2019 11:21AM

  I don't quite understand that, to be honest....

SunTzu_vs_Camus183May 11, 2019 07:14AM

  Re: I don't quite understand that, to be honest....

Ohiorams209May 11, 2019 07:23AM

  Re: this is so silly

Speed_Kills176May 11, 2019 04:44PM

  It's the market

zn164May 12, 2019 07:49AM

  Re: It's the market

Rams43152May 12, 2019 07:54AM

  Re: It's the market

zn194May 12, 2019 07:59AM

  Re: It's the market

Rams43146May 12, 2019 08:12AM

  Re: It's the market

zn148May 12, 2019 09:54AM

  Re: It's the market

David Deacon141May 12, 2019 10:50AM