In a friendly way, I'd like to respond to a couple of things.

I saw Foles lauded mightily after his game in Chicago. That's fine by itself, but it was obvious to me, even if not to you, that it was meant in contrast to Goff.

Then he lays an egg and we get the proverbial crickets from Goff critics.

I'm not sure why pointing out that Foles is who he is refutes that in any way. So we know he's up and down, so that doesn't count?

And why not mention it to those praising him when he was the good Foles? Why save it for me?

You say that the Luck failure was noted. Oh? I didn't see that.

I didn't see anyone who had criticized Goff for errant throws come on the board and say "Geez, now that I've seen a Luck meltdown, maybe I've been a little too hard on Goff!". I didn't see that.

Could you point me to that post?

I'm happy that you don't sweat the Goff Public Perception.

I'm not going to cop to the obvious inference. If you didn't sweat my posts, that would be cool.

---

Ramily!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/15/2019 09:00AM by Saguaro.