January 08, 2019 01:10PM
I used terms like: I doubt it. I'm not sure. And I even said: Do they miss Kupp? Oh yeah.

I love Kupp, loved him at EWU. I just thought I would show some simple numbers and let everyone make up their own mind.

I think the only conclusion I came to was the Rams miss Kupp, but McVay has adapted and it's really going to come down to running the football and not turning it over (and turnovers are always a key to winning).

I hope my previous post didn't come off salty as my kids would say.



Don't waste your time looking back, you're not going that way. - Ragnar Lothbrok
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

Deadpool556January 08, 2019 09:12AM

  Re: Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

stlramz198January 08, 2019 09:18AM

  man thats some good work

Speed_Kills122January 08, 2019 10:04AM

  Re: Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

ferragamo79192January 08, 2019 10:17AM

  He played 38% of the snaps in the Denver game

Deadpool139January 08, 2019 11:29AM

  Re: He played 38% of the snaps in the Denver game

ferragamo79111January 08, 2019 11:53AM

  Did I come to a conclusion though?

Deadpool86January 08, 2019 01:10PM

  Re: Did I come to a conclusion though?

kw1383January 08, 2019 02:11PM

  well said

ferragamo7962January 08, 2019 03:41PM

  Re: Did I come to a conclusion though?

ferragamo7969January 08, 2019 03:41PM

  Re: Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

LoboRam182January 08, 2019 11:24AM

  Nice work pool boy

Atlantic Ram89January 08, 2019 03:02PM

  Re: Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

Steve66January 08, 2019 11:50PM