Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

January 08, 2019 09:12AM
I thought I would look at all the offensive stats with and without Kupp to see if there were some misconceptions out there. What I found is a bit of both IMO. here are the ones I thought mattered:

Scoring:
w/ Kupp - 33.4 ppg
w/o Kupp - 32.5 ppg

take the Bears game out (no Kupp) and it goes up to 36.3 ppg.

Passing yards per game:
w/ Kupp - 319.8 pyg
w/o Kupp - 218.6 ypg

take the Bears game out (no Kupp) and it moves up to 226.7 pyg

Total yards per game:
w/ Kupp - 415.6 tyg
w/o Kupp - 376.6 tyg

take the Bears game out and it moves to 400 tyg

First downs per game:
w/ Kupp - 21.1 fdpg
w/o Kupp - 19.1 fdpg

take the Bears game out and it moves up to 19.5 fdpg

Turnovers per game:
w/ Kupp - 0.9 topg
w/o Kupp - 1.5 topg

I showed the numbers with and without the Bears game because it was an anomaly. I prefer not to do that because the game happened and I don't like to cherry pick to make a point. It looks like i have an agenda.

The scoring really remained the same, before and after Kupp. 0.9 points to me is not that big of a deal. And regardless 32.5 ppg is still 2nd best in the NFL.

Where you do see the dropoff is in passing yards per game. 100 yards is huge, but they just make up for it with an additional 60 rushing yards per game. IMO I don't care where the yards come from as long as they come and they are only off 40 yards per game without Kupp.

What is the real issue here? IMO its the turnovers. If the Rams averaged the 1.5 turnovers per game without Kupp for the whole season they would have tied for 8 in giveaways. They finished tied for 18th.

Would .6 turnovers per game less make up for the 2 first downs and 40 yards less per game? Who knows, but I would be willing to bet those numbers would get a heck of a lot closer.

So do the Rams miss Copper? Oh yeah. But have they missed him enough to score less? No. Are these extra turnovers the result of Kupp not being in the lineup? I doubt it.

The one stat I didn't touch on but will now: rushing yards per game.

Here are the Rams rushing yards in their 3 losses:
92 (NO), 52 (Chi), 82 (Phi)

Those are 3 of the 5 worst rushing totals of the season. The other 2 were week 2 vs the Cardinals (90 yards) and KC where Gurley was dinged (76 yards)

The team averaged over 139 yards per game this season, 154 yards per game in their wins. 75 yards per game in their losses. Or less then 1/2 then in their wins. So as much as the Rams miss Kupp, the Rams need to:
1. run the ball
2. take care of the football.

Thats why i am not worried about the loss of Kupp as much as I am worried about Gurley's health and Goff's turnovers. The Rams win the TO battle, run the ball and they win football games. Defense be danged.



Don't waste your time looking back, you're not going that way. - Ragnar Lothbrok
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

Deadpool549January 08, 2019 09:12AM

  Re: Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

stlramz195January 08, 2019 09:18AM

  man thats some good work

Speed_Kills119January 08, 2019 10:04AM

  Re: Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

ferragamo79189January 08, 2019 10:17AM

  He played 38% of the snaps in the Denver game

Deadpool135January 08, 2019 11:29AM

  Re: He played 38% of the snaps in the Denver game

ferragamo79107January 08, 2019 11:53AM

  Did I come to a conclusion though?

Deadpool83January 08, 2019 01:10PM

  Re: Did I come to a conclusion though?

kw1380January 08, 2019 02:11PM

  well said

ferragamo7960January 08, 2019 03:41PM

  Re: Did I come to a conclusion though?

ferragamo7967January 08, 2019 03:41PM

  Re: Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

LoboRam179January 08, 2019 11:24AM

  Nice work pool boy

Atlantic Ram86January 08, 2019 03:02PM

  Re: Some stats with and without Kupp. I'm a bit surprised

Steve64January 08, 2019 11:50PM