So, roman, do you feel that legit criticism of players is off limits because we have a 10-1 record?

I think praise, where earned, is appropriate, but so is constructive criticism., where earned. Shouldn’t allow one without the other, IMO.

Heaven knows that our D has plenty of room for improvement.

Now, about Suh? If it’s okay to say that AD benefits from Suh’s presence, then why not ask if AD’s presence should be helping Suh? Or Brockers? The problem is just where are these results from Suh and Brockers?

Asking these questions seems legit to me. I urge you to isolate on Suh if you have the game recorded and judge for yourself. Or isolate on him in his next game. Then, you be the judge.