October 12, 2018 12:35PM
it's ROI.

He need's to fill the house.

Stan isn't about collecting SB rings. He's about maximizing his investment. Now...he is one hell of a businessman. So yes, he understands winning equals full house equals maximum return.

I'm not saying there is anything wrong with it. It's just is what it is.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Pats wouldn't be the Pats without Bellichek

RockRam449October 12, 2018 09:24AM

  Re: Pats wouldn't be the Pats without Bellichek

dzrams193October 12, 2018 10:07AM

  Stan would have to have mush for brains

NewMexicoRam285October 12, 2018 11:31AM

  McVay has EVERYTHING he wants in the Rams

chunkmeister273October 12, 2018 11:48AM

  Re: McVay has EVERYTHING he wants in the Rams

den-the-coach189October 12, 2018 12:05PM

  Dilly, dilly!

Deadhead Ram189October 12, 2018 12:09PM

  Re: I just have one disagreement

embraceable_ewe83203October 12, 2018 03:54PM

  Re: McVay has EVERYTHING he wants in the Rams

JYB177October 12, 2018 04:11PM

  But it will always come back to an ROI calculation for him...

jemach297October 12, 2018 12:05PM

  Re: But it will always come back to an ROI calculation for him...

den-the-coach184October 12, 2018 12:11PM

  You just agreed...

jemach163October 12, 2018 12:35PM

  Re: You just agreed...

bigjimram21147October 12, 2018 08:19PM

  Actually one of the things I do like...

jemach230October 13, 2018 04:34AM

  Don't care about other NFL owners. Stan Kroenke is the best

Anonymous User153October 13, 2018 08:04AM

  would the Pats have any superbowls without him

Rams_81138October 13, 2018 05:26AM

  Re: would the Pats have any superbowls without him

SoCalRAMatic154October 13, 2018 06:04AM

  Pats have any superbowls without him: Go SoCalRAMatic

Anonymous User143October 13, 2018 08:28AM