Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: fine take, Rock

April 26, 2018 04:58AM
I do think you're probably right. Not quite as desperate at LB as all that.

I saw something regarding Ramik a while back as being the starter there in the middle.

However, as a senior football addict I continue to believe that MLB is the crucial piece in my front seven.
I'll take a smart kid in there over a rotational edge rusher.

That said, I would be surprised if their first 4 picks don't involve a lot of help at the two spots.
BTW, I like Hager, and he was not overwhelmed during his snaps. Fact is, he held up a lot better than the rest of the defense when they played the 9ers at the end.

I think we need a starter at LB and rotational guys at the edges. It's possible that they can do all that within the draft with just 3 picks.
And, I would not be surprised if the Rams cast off 2 or 3 picks in the efforts to acquire just that.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  I just don't buy that we have "holes" at ILB and OLB.

RockRam3681April 26, 2018 03:58AM

  I with you, we could be stronger but we are ok

Los Angeles Lenny183April 26, 2018 04:11AM

  Re: I with you, we could be stronger but we are ok

SoCalRAMatic175April 26, 2018 04:21AM

  Re: agree, rams can take BPA at their picks...

spagsbacker171April 26, 2018 04:40AM

  Re: agree, rams can take BPA at their picks...

Rams43148April 26, 2018 05:45AM

  Re: fine take, Rock

leafnose168April 26, 2018 04:58AM

  Re: I just don't buy that we have "holes" at ILB and OLB.

hammer197April 26, 2018 05:17AM

  Re: I just don't buy that we have "holes" at ILB and OLB.

oldschoolramfan143April 26, 2018 05:30AM

  Great Take but it is relative

David Deacon138April 26, 2018 06:24AM

  and im still holding out hope for.......

joram151April 26, 2018 12:18PM