False premise, 89. Watkins was not intended to be a 1 year rental. In fact, that was the worst case scenario.
Suh, I think, is a 1 year rental. But we gave up no pick for him.
We all thought that Watkins was a coup at the time. At least I know that I did. Expected #1 WR huge production from him under McVay. Just didn’t work out.
As Rock posted, it seemed like a risk well worth taking. No guts, no glory?
But they coped beautifully with Cooks. He’s not intended as a 1 year rental, either. I love his chances to be a Ram for 5 more years. We’ll see.
