[
en.wikipedia.org]
Kurt was between Kerry Collins and Randall Cunningham in career yards and had like 5-6 poor to average years from 2002-2007.
He was 36th in all time passing yards.
Pace's performance while cannot be proven statically, was a different player after he started to hold out and his hold outs were largely responsible in teams not making it up to their potential. I think he was very overrated from 2002 forward. I get he was dominant in 1999-2001, but he wasn't the same player later.
Faulk was 11th in career yards but there is a big difference between his early years with the Colts and his less than 4.0 yards per carry years and his 5.5 yards per carry years with the Rams. I think he is close to Bruce with his career, but Bruce is #5 in career yards and 5th is better than 11th.
[
www.pro-football-reference.com]
[
www.pro-football-reference.com]
Note 2 of those top 5 first past up Bruce this year in career yards. The thing that makes Bruce stand out his he was great in almost all circumstances. With great players around him on a great team and without any great players on a bad team. he really only had 2 down years, the years Martz left the Rams to go to the Redskins in his core of his career while the other guys had more years where they didn't perform at the high level.
And lastly, it was Bruce that made the big play to win a superbowl, turning a game ending interception into a game winning touchdown, by not tipping off the pass was underthrown until the last second.
I look at it just the opposite. All of them except Pace deserve to be in the Hall of Fame, but Bruce is the most deserving. Pace doesn't deserve it because of his holdouts.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 02/04/2018 07:09PM by Rams_81.
