Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

That's the entire point

January 01, 2018 12:08PM
It is intentionally very much open to interpretation, i.e. opinion. That's why it's not enforced with any kind of rational consistency.

The rule might as well be written as: "Hits that look scary are penalties."
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Blake Countess' hit

NewMexicoRam868January 01, 2018 04:36AM

  Re: Blake Countess' hit

Steve342January 01, 2018 04:38AM

  Countess made a great hit. He did his job. Should not have been flagged

GreatRamNTheSky408January 01, 2018 04:40AM

  NFL: Never @@@@@@ Looked

NewMexicoRam330January 01, 2018 04:45AM

  Re: Countess made a great hit. He did his job. Should not have been flagged

Steve323January 01, 2018 04:55AM

  Agree completely...

jemach357January 01, 2018 04:42AM

  That is because the league is scared of post career lawsuits

GreatRamNTheSky255January 01, 2018 05:02AM

  good clean hit nm

joram249January 01, 2018 05:11AM

  should have flagged Jimmy G

Rampage2K-300January 01, 2018 07:13AM

  I’ve re-watched this hit several times on YouTube...

Rams43337January 01, 2018 08:28AM

  Re: So how should the "rule" be written?...

laram278January 01, 2018 08:31AM

  Re: So how should the "rule" be written?...

EastRam381January 01, 2018 08:52AM

  This is right there with the "catch" rule...

jemach241January 01, 2018 09:00AM

  Re: Kid was out, out, out.......update on condition?

leafnose213January 01, 2018 10:22AM

  Re: Kid was out, out, out.......update on condition?

embraceable_ewe83448January 01, 2018 11:51AM

  Here's how the rule should be written

9er8er241January 01, 2018 10:36AM

  Thanks for posting rule...

jemach212January 01, 2018 11:30AM

  It's not so much that the refs don't understand it

9er8er257January 01, 2018 11:47AM

  Re: Problem is, that's NOT the rule in its entirety......

laram251January 01, 2018 11:38AM

  It IS the rule in it's entirety

9er8er244January 01, 2018 11:58AM

  Re:People can watch the video and form their own opinion...NM

laram215January 01, 2018 12:00PM

  That's the entire point

9er8er207January 01, 2018 12:08PM

  It was a clean hit

Ram49244January 01, 2018 10:37AM

  Re:Wasn't Countess fined for the same hit on Fleener??...NM

laram251January 01, 2018 11:52AM

  Yup, repeat offender in their eyes? (nm)

Ramsfsninmd186January 01, 2018 11:57AM

  Not the "same hit"

9er8er253January 01, 2018 12:03PM

  It was a dreadful hit

RamUK292January 01, 2018 01:39PM

  Re: Blake Countess' hit

NorCalRamFan240January 01, 2018 08:08PM