Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I respect your opinion, but not playing key players makes the most sense

December 28, 2017 03:09AM
No doubt, winning against the Niners got a lot harder by not playing the core players on our team. But it hardly means that the game is unwinnable.

What odds would I give us winning it? About 40%.

Frankly, I love that some back up players who don't get many minutes get a chance to show their stuff. Good for the players, good for the Rams.

No one has any idea which seed is better to have: the 3 or the 4. The circumstances are identical: both have to play a WC team the week following the last regular season game. And, who is to say which opponent is more favorable to the Rams? That is pure speculation. And even so, the Rams have no way to guide themselves towards a choice of which opponent they play.

Home or road? The Rams have played better on the road. So it seems the lower the seed the better. If you count the London game as a road game, then the Rams are 8-1 on the road and only 3-3 at home. Absolutely no home advantage for the Rams.

And.....the Niners are playing hot and loose. They'd love to knock off the Division Champs to end their year. The Rams players know that they have next to nothing significant to gain by the outcome of this Sunday. How hard and passionate do you suppose they'll play against the Niners? Most of these players weren't around when the Niners were the Rams' main rival. These guys have played during the Rams-Seahawks rivalry era.

It would not be responsible for McVay to put key players in harms way for some mano-e-mano imaginary rivalry game. The time off not only safeguards these players, it gives them time to rest their bodies and minds and to heal up some dings and bruises.

It's not just the smart play; it's the only play to sit as many starters as possible.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  If Rams play Saints in NFC championship

Rams_81820December 27, 2017 05:21PM

  Rams are 7-1 on the road

NewMexicoRam438December 27, 2017 05:29PM

  Saints are 7-1 at home with only loss to Patriots

Rams_81245December 27, 2017 05:48PM

  Re: Saints are 7-1 at home with only loss to Patriots

stlrams13321December 27, 2017 05:55PM

  How many of those seven road games...

L.A.Rams202December 28, 2017 03:23AM

  Re: How many of those seven road games...

Hollywood Ram210December 28, 2017 05:20AM

  Re: How many of those seven road games...

L.A.Rams215December 28, 2017 05:55AM

  Playing Minnesota in Jan, is no different than Minnesota in Nov....

RAMbler214December 28, 2017 06:34AM

  Re: If Rams play Saints in NFC championship

TheGuru285December 27, 2017 05:41PM

  Don't under Estimate Goff.

GreatRamNTheSky326December 28, 2017 03:24AM

  it is a stupid decision to not play for the #3 seed

L.A.Rams255December 27, 2017 06:34PM

  Re: 4 seed better than the 3

XXXIVwin302December 27, 2017 07:22PM

  Re: 4 seed better than the 3

Killrazor239December 28, 2017 01:40AM

  Home WC Game is theirs at 3 or 4 nm

Hazlet Hacksaw200December 28, 2017 01:51AM

  Re: Home WC Game is theirs at 3 or 4 nm

Killrazor210December 28, 2017 01:53AM

  I'm more worried about the home game than any others

NewMexicoRam265December 28, 2017 02:57AM

  Re: I'm more worried about the home game than any others

RFIP201December 28, 2017 06:09AM

  you could be right

L.A.Rams305December 28, 2017 03:16AM

  another factor

L.A.Rams199December 28, 2017 03:22AM

  I respect your opinion, but not playing key players makes the most sense

RockRam191December 28, 2017 03:09AM

  Rams 7-1 on the road

GreatRamNTheSky201December 28, 2017 03:22AM

  Mannion getting experience does have value

Rams_81191December 28, 2017 05:35AM

  A non 1 or 2 seed has hosted only 2 conf champ games since 1990

oswald12212December 28, 2017 04:04AM

  Re: A non 1 or 2 seed has hosted only 2 conf champ games since 1990

LMU93212December 28, 2017 05:01AM

  those percentages don't matter

L.A.Rams201December 28, 2017 06:02AM