Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: My question is...

December 20, 2017 09:39AM
Quote
Suh-weet!
Quote
Rams43
Quote
Suh-weet!
I'm as delighted as everyone else to have Fisher gone and McVay at the helm. but can we give a little credit where some is due.

Of the 11 Pro Bowlers, alternates, and snubs identified in the ESPN article, 10 were acquired under Fisher/Snead.

Emphasis Snead, Suh. Lol.

... why be so withholding in praise of Fisher? By all accounts, Fisher and Snead were both loud, joint voices in all personnel decisions. Most of us agree that Fisher was awful in some key ways and are delighted to have McVay in his place. Why the unwillingness to also acknowledge that Fisher ALSO played a major role in acquiring a LOT of players that turned out to be pretty danged good?

Because Fisher was tone deaf on O matters, Suh. I don’t think that’s even debatable given our hindsight.

Hell, he couldn’t even bring himself to hire competent OC’s! Or maybe competent OC’s refused to work for him?

Even when good O players were brought in, Fisher and his crack O staff couldn’t properly develop them. Bradford, Foles, Keenum? Just to mention some QB’s? Geez, Fisher loved Barnes, Britt, Quick, and Kendricks. They’d all probably still be here had Fisher remained.

Look, McVay at the age of 31 and in his first year as Ram HC has provided AMPLE evidence of Fisher’s shortcomings. And Snead, without being hampered by Fisher, just had a terrific draft even though lacking a 1st rounder.

Common sense tells me that Snead gets the lion’s share of the credit for bringing in O talent. Fisher is Dead to me.

I rest my case.

Rant over...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  5 Pro Bowlers

Blue and Gold1108December 19, 2017 03:05PM

  Goff will go to Pro Bowl to replace Wentz

Blue and Gold364December 19, 2017 03:07PM

  What a difference a year makes! Nm

jemach237December 19, 2017 03:08PM

  No he won't

max505December 19, 2017 03:24PM

  Re: No he won't: I like the way you think! NM

guinnessram421December 19, 2017 03:31PM

  Re: No he won't

Ramsdude276December 19, 2017 03:47PM

  Congrats to all...

jemach272December 19, 2017 03:07PM

  Feel bad for Saffold

max328December 19, 2017 03:08PM

  Re: he needs to play in the NFC East

Speed_Kills252December 19, 2017 03:17PM

  Whitworth

9er8er287December 19, 2017 03:22PM

  Re: With 8 sacks allowed?...

laram312December 19, 2017 03:26PM

  No

9er8er271December 19, 2017 03:44PM

  Re: and even if it was 8

Speed_Kills251December 19, 2017 03:46PM

  Re: No

laram394December 19, 2017 03:52PM

  Re: Feel bad for Saffold

CraigMatson250December 19, 2017 03:40PM

  Re: I'm with that!!...NM

laram252December 19, 2017 03:42PM

  Re: Feel bad for Saffold

Rampage2K-220December 19, 2017 06:07PM

  Re: Feel bad for Saffold

cool_hand_luke264December 19, 2017 07:44PM

  Bulls eye

RamUK234December 19, 2017 03:53PM

  Re: Bulls eye

LMU93220December 20, 2017 03:13AM

  #1 in Pt Differential, yet only 1 off player and 1 def player...

max250December 19, 2017 03:37PM

  Rams took 3 of 4 ST spots

NewMexicoRam243December 19, 2017 05:32PM

  I count 7 sacks

Blue and Gold260December 19, 2017 05:59PM

  Re: 5 Pro Bowlers

Glyndwr71217December 20, 2017 01:26AM

  article (includes snubs)

21Dog221December 20, 2017 05:29AM

  The 5 Ram selections were all no brainers...

Rams43200December 20, 2017 07:45AM

  Re: article (includes snubs)

Rampage2K-210December 20, 2017 08:44AM

  10 of the 11 acquired under Fisher/Snead regime

Suh-weet!237December 20, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: 10 of the 11 acquired under Fisher/Snead regime

Rams43202December 20, 2017 09:08AM

  My question is...

Suh-weet!296December 20, 2017 09:14AM

  Re: My question is...

Rams43230December 20, 2017 09:39AM

  Re: My question is...

stlrams13244December 20, 2017 09:46AM

  True, however...

Saguaro195December 20, 2017 09:22AM

  Of course, and...

Suh-weet!217December 20, 2017 09:27AM

  Re: True, however...

Rampage2K-231December 20, 2017 09:28AM

  Glad it's not hard for YOU, R2K!

Suh-weet!205December 20, 2017 01:11PM