December 05, 2017 04:18AM
Fascinating!

YorkiePud answered the key question.

It is indeed all “relative”.... to the Theory of Relativity, that is.

When we all watched the play live, the camera was moving forward along with Wilson, so it definitely appeared to be a lateral, and Wilson did indeed toss it behind him.

However, subsequent replays— from a non moving camera— showed that “relative” to the hash marks on the field (which are fixed in place of course) the ball did indeed drift forward.

So: Rugby rules define a lateral relative to the moving players, while American football rules define a lateral relative to fixed markers on the field.

Now, one could argue that the rotation of the earth causes the field itself to move, but that is another matter...spin tounge smiley
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  I have never seen a bigger collection of biased morons.

Saguaro1433December 04, 2017 06:16PM

  Re: I have never seen a bigger collection of biased morons.

XXXIVwin439December 04, 2017 08:17PM

  Re: I have never seen a bigger collection of biased morons.

YorkiePud373December 05, 2017 01:24AM

  I saw that

max382December 05, 2017 02:24AM

  It doesn't happen that often in rugby at all

RamUK331December 05, 2017 04:25AM

  Yes it does

dr-funkenstein-298December 06, 2017 10:13AM

  I only played the game for 10 years

RamUK296December 07, 2017 03:56AM

  I think we may be arguing different things

dr-funkenstein-304December 07, 2017 11:33AM

  Legal in rugby, not legal in football. nm

dr-funkenstein-293December 06, 2017 10:06AM

  Re: I resemble that remark!

Speed_Kills370December 05, 2017 03:05AM

  Why?

max522December 05, 2017 03:10AM

  It sure did look like a lateral.

Saguaro383December 05, 2017 03:22AM

  I don't think so....

JamesJM340December 05, 2017 03:39AM

  Re: again ... I say this is a lateral

Speed_Kills323December 05, 2017 03:47AM

  LOL....

JamesJM309December 05, 2017 03:56AM

  Well...let's see. I KNOW my good friend is not a moron.

Saguaro339December 05, 2017 04:17AM

  lol!!!! nm

Speed_Kills436December 05, 2017 04:30AM

  Einstein

XXXIVwin325December 05, 2017 04:18AM

  Re: I like this lol nm

Speed_Kills301December 05, 2017 04:31AM

  Re: Einstein' ..That's it exactly LOL

RAMSINCE ARNETT311December 05, 2017 05:53AM

  Re: Einstein... and now Neil deGrasse Tyson

XXXIVwin305December 05, 2017 04:43PM

  Tyson was never the same after Buster Douglas nm

21Dog288December 05, 2017 09:52PM

  True, but...

JamesJM293December 05, 2017 09:53PM

  me, too

21Dog302December 05, 2017 10:00PM

  yup (nm

wv ram285December 05, 2017 04:41AM

  Re: I admit I did not watch the replay closely

Speed_Kills446December 05, 2017 03:40AM

  Simply put...

max319December 05, 2017 04:15AM

  Re: I admit I did not watch the replay closely

ABQRam324December 05, 2017 04:17AM

  Re: I admit I did not watch the replay closely

Mackeyser383December 06, 2017 12:46AM

  Re: I admit I did not watch the replay closely

ABQRam305December 06, 2017 02:22PM

  Re: ABQ and Mackeyser

XXXIVwin300December 06, 2017 03:18PM

  Re: ABQ and Mackeyser

XXXIVwin302December 06, 2017 05:12PM

  If you say so!

NewMexicoRam285December 06, 2017 02:05PM

  Re: It sure did look like a lateral.

bigjimram21272December 06, 2017 07:48PM

  The NFL has ruled...

jemach333December 05, 2017 05:53PM

  I wouldn't call anyone a "moron" on that call

waterfield351December 05, 2017 09:30PM

  I find this interesting for one reason...

JamesJM312December 05, 2017 09:39PM

  I'm sure you wouldn't.

Saguaro313December 06, 2017 04:13AM

  Re: I wouldn't call anyone a "moron" on that call

zn324December 06, 2017 04:13AM

  Re: I wouldn't call anyone a "moron" on that call

waterfield495December 06, 2017 09:28AM

  Re: I wouldn't call anyone a "moron" on that call

AlbaNY_Ram281December 06, 2017 09:32AM

  Re: I wouldn't call anyone a "moron" on that call

waterfield330December 06, 2017 09:50AM

  You can tell by the yard markers . . . Bingo.

BC Ramsfan351December 06, 2017 10:22AM

  Re: You can tell by the yard markers . . . Bingo.

waterfield508December 06, 2017 12:00PM

  You might want to re-read that rule max posted

Drew2839309December 06, 2017 12:46PM

  Nvm. Misread you.

Drew2839417December 06, 2017 12:48PM

  Precisely

waterfield310December 06, 2017 12:51PM

  Indeed! nm

Drew2839281December 06, 2017 01:03PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

XXXIVwin332December 06, 2017 02:08PM

  Great post. Just for that...

Saguaro322December 06, 2017 02:33PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

waterfield305December 06, 2017 03:46PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

XXXIVwin291December 06, 2017 03:56PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

waterfield384December 06, 2017 04:08PM

  Hitting the ground is not a problem with laterals.

Saguaro272December 06, 2017 04:21PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

XXXIVwin305December 06, 2017 05:01PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

waterfield303December 06, 2017 05:24PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

XXXIVwin330December 06, 2017 05:43PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

waterfield290December 06, 2017 05:49PM

  Re: Triple Bingo and bringing the Funk to Einstein

XXXIVwin339December 06, 2017 06:20PM

  One last question from me, X. You're so good at this.

Saguaro305December 06, 2017 05:50PM

  Re: One last question from me, X. You're so good at this.

XXXIVwin320December 06, 2017 06:27PM

  Isn't that a hypothetical question itself?? nm

Drew2839263December 06, 2017 07:29PM

  Re: You can tell by the yard markers

BC Ramsfan337December 06, 2017 01:39PM

  The path the ball takes doesn't matter

Drew2839311December 06, 2017 03:03PM

  Re: The path the ball takes doesn't matter

XXXIVwin289December 06, 2017 03:20PM

  Life goes on in Seattle

EternalHorns308December 06, 2017 03:55AM